CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

customerio-ci-integration

Configure Customer.io CI/CD integration with automated testing. Use when setting up GitHub Actions, integration test suites, or pre-commit validation for Customer.io code. Trigger: "customer.io ci", "customer.io github actions", "customer.io pipeline", "customer.io automated testing".

67

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with complete executable code and a clear step sequence, but it is weakened by an orphaned, unlinked reference file, heavy duplication of that reference's content inline, and a stub cleanup script that leaves the destructive batch operations without a real verify/retry feedback loop.

Suggestions

Link references/implementation-guide.md from the body (e.g., 'For GitLab CI and full environment setup, see implementation-guide.md') and move the duplicated GitHub Actions workflow and test-fixture code out of SKILL.md into that reference, keeping the body as an overview.

Replace the Step 4 cleanup stub with a real cleanup routine that suppresses/destroys known test user IDs and add a retry-on-failure loop, satisfying the verify/retry feedback the Error Handling table promises for destructive batch operations.

Tighten the body by removing the content duplicated between SKILL.md and the reference so each token earns its place and the two files stop carrying redundant implementations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient executable code with little concept explanation, but it duplicates full GitHub Actions workflow, test fixtures, and integration tests that also appear in references/implementation-guide.md, and could be tightened; this matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean top anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready artifacts — a complete GitHub Actions YAML, TypeScript test utils, an integration test suite, `gh secret set` commands, and lint-staged config — with no pseudocode, matching the top anchor for concrete executable guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Six steps are clearly sequenced with a credential-validation checkpoint and `if: always()` cleanup, but the destructive batch user operations lack a real verification/retry feedback loop — the Step 4 cleanup script is a stub that only logs — which caps destructive/batch workflow clarity at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A reference file (references/implementation-guide.md) exists but is never linked or signaled from the body, and detailed implementation content that belongs in the reference is duplicated inline; this matches 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline', short of the well-signaled one-level-deep top anchor.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: third-person voice, a clear statement of capability, an explicit 'Use when' clause, and concrete trigger phrases scoped to the Customer.io CI niche. It fully satisfies the what/when requirement with no vagueness or over-claiming.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Configure Customer.io CI/CD integration with automated testing', 'GitHub Actions', 'integration test suites', 'pre-commit validation' — matching the anchor for naming several specific concrete actions rather than a vague single domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Configure Customer.io CI/CD integration with automated testing') and when (an explicit 'Use when setting up GitHub Actions...' clause plus a Trigger line), matching the top anchor for both what AND when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides natural phrases a user would say — 'customer.io ci', 'customer.io github actions', 'customer.io pipeline', 'customer.io automated testing' — giving good coverage of likely trigger variations, not just jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped tightly to Customer.io CI/CD with triggers tied to that niche, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; it is not a score of 2 because the triggers are clearly distinct rather than broadly overlapping.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 2 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.