customerio-ci-integration
Configure Customer.io CI/CD integration with automated testing. Use when setting up GitHub Actions, integration test suites, or pre-commit validation for Customer.io code. Trigger: "customer.io ci", "customer.io github actions", "customer.io pipeline", "customer.io automated testing".
85
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid skill description that clearly identifies its niche at the intersection of Customer.io and CI/CD tooling. It provides explicit trigger terms and covers both what the skill does and when to use it. The main weakness is that the 'what' could be more specific about the concrete outputs or configurations it produces beyond the general 'configure CI/CD integration'.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions to the 'what' portion, e.g., 'Generates GitHub Actions workflow files, configures test runners for Customer.io webhooks and campaigns, sets up pre-commit hooks for liquid template validation.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Customer.io CI/CD) and some actions (automated testing, setting up GitHub Actions, integration test suites, pre-commit validation), but the actions are somewhat generic and not deeply specific about what the skill actually produces or configures. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (configure Customer.io CI/CD integration with automated testing) and 'when' (setting up GitHub Actions, integration test suites, or pre-commit validation for Customer.io code), with explicit trigger terms listed. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger terms that users would naturally say: 'customer.io ci', 'customer.io github actions', 'customer.io pipeline', 'customer.io automated testing'. Also includes natural keywords like 'GitHub Actions', 'integration test suites', 'pre-commit validation'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Customer.io' with CI/CD concepts creates a very specific niche. The trigger terms are highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills or generic Customer.io skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a highly actionable skill with excellent workflow clarity and real, executable code throughout. Its main weakness is length — the inline code blocks make it token-heavy, and the cleanup script (Step 4) is essentially a placeholder that doesn't actually clean up anything beyond what the test helper already does. The best practices and error handling tables add value but could be more concise.
Suggestions
The cleanup script in Step 4 is a no-op (just console.log statements) — either make it functional (e.g., accept test run IDs as arguments) or remove it and note that cleanup is handled by the afterAll hook in the test helpers.
Consolidate the 'CI Best Practices' and 'Error Handling' tables into a single concise section to reduce redundancy (e.g., 'test user pollution' appears in both).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly long (~200 lines) with substantial code blocks. Some content is useful but there's redundancy — the cleanup script (Step 4) is essentially a no-op placeholder with console.log statements, and the best practices/error handling tables partially overlap. The CI best practices and error handling sections could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent actionability — every step provides fully executable, copy-paste ready code: complete GitHub Actions YAML, TypeScript test helpers, integration test suite, bash commands for secrets setup, and lint-staged configuration. All code is concrete and uses real libraries with proper imports. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced across 6 steps with logical ordering (workflow → fixtures → tests → cleanup → secrets → pre-commit). Validation checkpoints are present: credential validation before integration tests, unit tests gating integration tests via `needs`, `afterAll` cleanup, and the `if: always()` cleanup step. The credential-missing graceful skip is a good error recovery pattern. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic file with all code inline. Given the length and complexity (6 multi-file steps), some content like the full integration test suite or test helpers could be split into referenced files. However, the section headers provide reasonable navigation, and there are no bundle files to reference. The 'Next Steps' reference to `customerio-deploy-pipeline` is a good touch. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3a2d27d
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.