CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

customerio-local-dev-loop

Configure Customer.io local development workflow. Use when setting up local testing, dev/staging isolation, or mocking Customer.io for unit tests. Trigger: "customer.io local dev", "test customer.io locally", "customer.io dev environment", "customer.io sandbox", "mock customer.io".

71

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable code and a well-sequenced workflow including cleanup validation, but it is over-inlined — a bundled reference file exists yet is never linked, and content that belongs in sub-files is kept in SKILL.md.

Suggestions

Link to references/implementation-guide.md from the body (e.g., a '## Implementation details' section pointing to it) so the bundled reference is actually reachable and progressive disclosure improves.

Move the full DevTrackClient, mock module, and integration test into the reference file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with concise representative snippets.

Tighten the inline code in the overview to the minimum needed to demonstrate each step, reducing token cost while preserving the actionable guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with no padding explaining what Customer.io is, but the body inlines a full DevTrackClient implementation, a complete mock module, and a full integration test that arguably belong in the bundled reference rather than the SKILL.md overview. Not a 1 because there is no verbose concept explanation, but not a 3 since not every token earns its place in an overview document.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable TypeScript, bash commands, env files, and package.json scripts that are copy-paste ready — matching the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor. Not a 2 because the examples are real, complete code rather than pseudocode or vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation/cleanup checkpoint in Step 4 — an afterAll that suppresses and destroys test users plus a credential-rejection test — and an Error Handling table for recovery. Not a 2 because validation feedback loops are present for the destructive/batch test-user operations rather than being missing or only implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A references/implementation-guide.md bundle exists but the body never signals or links to it, and all detailed content (full client, mocks, integration tests) is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep references. Not a 1 because the body is organized into sections rather than a monolithic wall or deeply nested references, but not a 3 because there are no clearly signaled one-level-deep references and content that should be separate remains inline.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with a comprehensive set of natural trigger terms. It is concrete, third-person, and clearly distinguishes the skill from others.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'Configure Customer.io local development workflow', 'local testing, dev/staging isolation', and 'mocking Customer.io for unit tests' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor. Not a 2 because it enumerates 3+ distinct actions rather than naming only a domain and a few actions; written in third person so no specificity penalty applies.

3 / 3

Completeness

Answers both 'what' (configure Customer.io local dev workflow) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when setting up local testing, dev/staging isolation, or mocking Customer.io for unit tests' clause. Not a 2 because the 'when' is explicit rather than only implied, and not capped at 2 since the 'Use when...' clause is present.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit trigger list — 'customer.io local dev', 'test customer.io locally', 'customer.io dev environment', 'customer.io sandbox', 'mock customer.io' — gives good coverage of natural phrasings a user would say. Not a 2 because it covers common variations and natural terms rather than only a single relevant keyword.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (Customer.io local development/testing) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not a 2 because it is far more specific than 'works with document files'-style overlap examples and unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.