CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

evernote-cost-tuning

Optimize Evernote integration costs and resource usage. Use when managing API quotas, reducing storage usage, or optimizing upload limits. Trigger with phrases like "evernote cost", "evernote quota", "evernote limits", "evernote upload".

61

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/saas-packs/evernote-pack/skills/evernote-cost-tuning/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured skill body with strong progressive disclosure and some genuinely executable code, but it is held back by mild redundancy, incomplete code coverage in the later steps, and missing validation checkpoints around destructive cleanup operations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint before Step 4 deletions, e.g. confirm a note has no notebook dependencies / is in trash before removing it, and verify reclaimed quota after cleanup.

Provide small executable snippets for Steps 3-5 (e.g. a findNotesMetadata read call and a threshold-check helper) instead of leaving them directional and deferring all code to the reference.

De-duplicate the account-tier figures: keep them only in the Account Limits Reference table and remove the redundant restatement from Prerequisites, and consider trimming the Output section since it restates the per-step deliverables.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with dense, useful tables and no over-explanation of Evernote concepts, but the account tiers are stated twice (Prerequisites and the Account Limits Reference table) and the Output section restates deliverables already covered in the steps, so it could be tightened rather than earning the level-3 'every token earns its place' bar.

2 / 3

Actionability

Steps 1-2 provide fully executable JavaScript (getQuotaStatus, estimateNoteSize, canUpload), but Steps 3-5 give only directional guidance ('List notes sorted by content length', 'Batch small notes where appropriate') with no code and defer details to the reference, leaving the guidance incomplete end-to-end.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The five steps are clearly sequenced, but there are no inline validation checkpoints, and Step 4 (Storage Cleanup) performs destructive batch deletions with no verification before removing notes/trash, which per the rubric caps this dimension at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference — '[Implementation Guide](references/implementation-guide.md)' (a real file) — for the complete utilities, with appropriately split content and easy navigation, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-formed description with explicit 'Use when' guidance and natural trigger phrases scoped to a distinct Evernote niche. Its only weakness is slightly generic action verbs that understate the concrete operations the skill performs.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and several targets ('managing API quotas, reducing storage usage, or optimizing upload limits') but relies on generic verbs (optimize, manage, reduce) rather than the crisp concrete actions (compress, monitor, reclaim) that the body actually performs, so it falls short of the level-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what ('Optimize Evernote integration costs and resource usage') and when ('Use when managing API quotas... Trigger with phrases like...') with an explicit trigger clause, satisfying both halves required for level 3.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It explicitly enumerates natural trigger phrases ('evernote cost', 'evernote quota', 'evernote limits', 'evernote upload') plus the 'Use when' targets, giving good coverage of terms a user would actually say, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Evernote-scoped triggers ('evernote cost/quota/limits/upload') form a clear, product-specific niche that is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.