exa-ci-integration
Configure Exa CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and automated testing. Use when setting up automated testing for Exa integrations, configuring CI pipelines, or adding Exa health checks to builds. Trigger with phrases like "exa CI", "exa GitHub Actions", "exa automated tests", "CI exa", "exa pipeline".
85
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with strong completeness and distinctiveness. It clearly identifies both what the skill does and when to use it, with explicit trigger phrases. The main weakness is that the capability description could be more specific about the concrete actions performed (e.g., generating workflow YAML files, configuring test runners, adding health check endpoints).
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions to the first sentence, e.g., 'Generates GitHub Actions workflow YAML, configures test runners for Exa API calls, and adds Exa health check steps to CI pipelines.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Exa CI/CD with GitHub Actions) and some actions (configure integration, automated testing), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions in detail—e.g., what specific configuration steps, what health checks entail, or what pipeline stages are involved. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (configure Exa CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and automated testing) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause and 'Trigger with phrases like...' clause providing clear selection guidance). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases like 'exa CI', 'exa GitHub Actions', 'exa automated tests', 'CI exa', 'exa pipeline'. These are terms a user would naturally say when needing this skill, with good coverage of variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Exa' (a specific product) with 'CI/CD' and 'GitHub Actions' creates a very distinct niche. It's unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills or generic Exa usage skills due to the specific intersection of both domains. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, highly actionable skill with complete, executable examples for CI/CD integration with Exa. The workflow is well-sequenced with proper validation gates and error handling. The main weakness is that it's somewhat lengthy — the full test suite and multiple workflow files could be split into referenced files for better progressive disclosure, and some content could be trimmed without losing clarity.
Suggestions
Move the full integration test suite (Step 3) and release workflow (Step 4) into separate referenced files to keep SKILL.md as a concise overview
Trim the integration test suite to 1-2 representative test cases with a note that additional tests follow the same pattern
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with executable examples, but includes some unnecessary verbosity — the integration test suite is quite long with four test cases when two would suffice to demonstrate the pattern. The prerequisites section states things Claude would know (npm project with vitest or jest). Some comments are redundant. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable code throughout: complete GitHub Actions YAML workflows, CLI commands for secret configuration, a full TypeScript test suite with proper imports and assertions, and a release gate workflow. Everything is copy-paste ready with specific versions, timeouts, and configurations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence from workflow setup → secrets configuration → test suite → release gate. Includes validation checkpoints (health check job, integration tests as release gate), conditional execution logic for fork PRs, and the error handling table provides a feedback loop for common failure modes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is fairly long (~130 lines of substantive content) and could benefit from splitting the integration test suite and release workflow into separate referenced files. The error handling table and resources section are well-organized, but the main body is somewhat monolithic with all workflow YAML and test code inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
c8a915c
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.