CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

exa-webhooks-events

Build event-driven integrations with Exa using scheduled monitors and content alerts. Use when building content monitoring, competitive intelligence pipelines, or scheduled search automation with Exa. Trigger with phrases like "exa monitor", "exa content alerts", "exa scheduled search", "exa event-driven", "exa notifications".

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/saas-packs/exa-pack/skills/exa-webhooks-events/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers mostly executable, lean TypeScript guidance across a clear five-step sequence with good section structure and one-level external references. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: a batch/scheduled monitoring skill ships no explicit validation or verification checkpoints in the flow, which caps that dimension at 3.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints between steps — e.g., after createMonitor confirm the BullMQ job was enqueued, and after each search verify rate-limit/empty-result conditions before sending webhooks — to raise workflow_clarity above the batch-operations cap of 3.

Define or stub the referenced helpers getLastCheckDate and updateLastResultUrls so the core monitor loop is fully copy-paste executable, pushing actionability toward score 5.

Move the larger code blocks (full Worker and digest generator) into a referenced scripts/ file with a one-line pointer from SKILL.md to improve progressive_disclosure toward the score-5 one-level-deep pattern.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Quotes compact framing like the Event Patterns and Error Handling tables plus five focused code blocks with minimal narration; it avoids explaining what webhooks, BullMQ, or Exa are, with only minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor rather than the fully lean score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Quotes five near-complete TypeScript blocks (createMonitor, the Worker, monitorSimilarContent, sendWebhook, generateDailyDigest) that are mostly executable, with only minor gaps such as the undefined helpers getLastCheckDate and updateLastResultUrls, matching 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps' below the copy-paste-ready score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Quotes a clear Step 1 through Step 5 sequence for scheduled/batch monitoring, but the workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints (no verify step after monitor creation or before webhook delivery); per the batch-operations cap this caps at 3 rather than reaching the score-4 anchor that requires most checkpoints present.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Quotes well-organized sections (Overview, Prerequisites, Event Patterns, Instructions, Error Handling, Examples, Resources) with one-level-deep external links such as '[Exa Search Reference](https://docs.exa.ai/reference/search)' and 'see exa-deploy-integration'; most content is appropriately placed with only minor organization gaps, sitting below the score-5 anchor that requires well-signaled one-level-deep file references (no bundle files exist here).

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it, with explicit Exa-scoped trigger phrases that keep conflict risk low. Specificity is the weakest dimension: it states the domain and a couple of mechanisms but does not list multiple concrete actions.

Suggestions

Expand the 'what' clause into a short list of concrete actions (e.g., 'schedule recurring Exa searches, diff result sets to detect new content, and deliver webhook notifications with retry') to lift specificity toward score 4-5.

Add natural-sounding synonyms or surface-level variants users might say (e.g., 'Exa alerts', 'Exa trigger', 'Exa feed') to round out trigger_term_quality toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes 'Build event-driven integrations with Exa using scheduled monitors and content alerts' — names the domain plus a couple concrete mechanisms, but does not enumerate multiple distinct actions, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the multi-action score-4 anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

Quotes both a clear 'what' ('Build event-driven integrations with Exa using scheduled monitors and content alerts') and an explicit 'when' with concrete trigger phrases ('Use when building content monitoring, competitive intelligence pipelines, or scheduled search automation with Exa. Trigger with phrases like...'), matching the score-5 anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes the explicit trigger list 'exa monitor', 'exa content alerts', 'exa scheduled search', 'exa event-driven', 'exa notifications' — several natural phrases a user would say, just shy of comprehensive synonym/extension coverage that defines score 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Quotes Exa-specific triggers ('exa monitor', 'exa scheduled search') scoping a clear niche around Exa event-driven integration, leaving minimal overlap risk with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.