gamma-cost-tuning

Optimize Gamma usage costs and manage API spending. Use when reducing API costs, implementing usage quotas, or planning for scale with budget constraints. Trigger with phrases like "gamma cost", "gamma billing", "gamma budget", "gamma expensive", "gamma pricing".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with concrete, executable code for every step, but it is verbose (redundant summary tables and inline classes), lacks validation feedback loops for its batch/budget operations, and fails to surface its own references/implementation.md bundle file.

Suggestions

Add a validate→fix→retry checkpoint to the budget/tracking workflow (e.g., verify the tracker is invoked on every generation path and confirm alerts were sent) to lift workflow clarity above 2.

Link references/implementation.md from the body and move the overlapping inline code (caching, quotas, batch ops) into it, keeping the body as a lean overview with one-level-deep references.

Trim the Cost Reduction Summary and Error Handling tables or fold them into the relevant code steps, since they restate details already shown in the examples.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids explaining basics Claude knows, but includes verbosity: the inline CreditTracker class, plus the Cost Reduction Summary, Error Handling, Plan Comparison, and Image Model Tiers tables restate information already conveyed by the code and overlap with the unreferenced references/implementation.md. This matches the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the lean level 3.	2 / 3
Actionability	Each step ships copy-paste-ready, executable TypeScript (generateTracked, imageOptions cost tiers, generateFromTemplate, budget thresholds, NodeCache caching) with inline comments, matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The five steps are sequenced, but this involves batch and budget operations with no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, no checkpoint confirming tracking is wired on all generation paths, and the error table itself flags 'Tracker not running' as a failure mode without a verification step. Per the rubric, missing validation/feedback in batch/financial operations caps workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A bundle file references/implementation.md exists but is never referenced or linked from the body (the body only links external web URLs and a Next Steps pointer), while large inline code blocks overlap with that orphaned reference. This matches the 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline' anchor.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys both what the skill does and when to use it, with strong natural trigger phrases and a distinct Gamma-specific niche. The only weakness is that the action list is general rather than enumerating the concrete cost-reduction operations covered in the body.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes 'Optimize Gamma usage costs and manage API spending' — it names the domain and two general actions but does not list multiple specific concrete actions (e.g., setting image tiers, configuring quotas, enabling caching), matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor rather than the multi-action level 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what ('Optimize Gamma usage costs and manage API spending') and when ('Use when reducing API costs...'; 'Trigger with phrases like...'), matching the level-3 anchor that requires explicit triggers for both.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Quotes explicit triggers 'gamma cost', 'gamma billing', 'gamma budget', 'gamma expensive', 'gamma pricing' — good natural coverage of terms a user would actually say, matching the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Gamma' niche plus gamma-prefixed trigger phrases make it clearly distinguishable and unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill, matching the level-3 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Commit: 1628598

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.