The body is mostly efficient and operational rather than explanatory, but at ~230 lines it is padded in places (e.g., the Overview repeats the description, the cutover email template and comparison tables could be tightened), so it could be leaner.

Provides copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — specific export menu paths per source tool, a runnable Python archive script, an assessment template, and concrete cutover checklists — rather than vague direction.

Seven clearly sequenced steps with checklists, verification checkpoints ('Verify archive is complete and accessible'), a parallel-run quality comparison, and a 3-day post-cutover monitoring loop plus an error-handling table for recovery.

Sections are well organized, but the body is largely monolithic: a bundle file references/implementation.md exists and expands the export procedures, yet it is never linked from the body, and that content is duplicated inline rather than split out and signaled.

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'data export from source tools, parallel-run strategy, team transition, and historical data preservation' — and names the specific source tools, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

Clearly states what it does (migrate to Granola from named tools, covering export/parallel-run/transition/preservation) and when to use it via an explicit Trigger clause, answering both what and when.

The explicit Trigger clause provides natural phrases a user would say — 'migrate to granola', 'switch to granola', 'granola from otter', 'replace meeting tool with granola' — giving good coverage of natural terms.

The niche is narrow and tool-specific (Granola migration from named competitors) with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely.