Iam Binding Creator - Auto-activating skill for GCP Skills. Triggers on: iam binding creator, iam binding creator Part of the GCP Skills skill category.
35
3%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.00xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/14-gcp-skills/iam-binding-creator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
7%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is severely underdeveloped, essentially just restating the skill name without explaining what it does or when to use it. It lacks concrete actions, natural trigger terms users would say, and any guidance for skill selection. The only slight positive is the GCP/IAM domain focus provides minimal distinctiveness.
Suggestions
Add specific actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates IAM policy bindings to grant roles to users, service accounts, or groups in Google Cloud Platform projects and resources.'
Include a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms like 'grant access', 'add permissions', 'assign role', 'service account access', 'GCP IAM policy', 'resource permissions'.
Remove the duplicate trigger term and expand to include variations users would naturally say when needing IAM binding functionality.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only names the skill ('Iam Binding Creator') without describing any concrete actions. There are no verbs or specific capabilities listed - it doesn't explain what creating an IAM binding actually involves. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond the name, and provides no 'when should Claude use it' guidance. There is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms are just the skill name repeated ('iam binding creator, iam binding creator'). Missing natural user terms like 'permissions', 'access control', 'service account', 'role assignment', 'GCP IAM', or 'grant access'. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The GCP/IAM binding focus provides some specificity that distinguishes it from general document or code skills, but 'GCP Skills' is vague and could overlap with other GCP-related skills without clearer boundaries. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill content is essentially a placeholder template with no actual instructional value. It contains no concrete information about GCP IAM bindings - no gcloud commands, no Terraform examples, no explanation of principals/roles/resources, and no validation steps. The content describes what the skill claims to do rather than providing any actionable guidance.
Suggestions
Add concrete gcloud commands for creating IAM bindings (e.g., `gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding PROJECT_ID --member='user:email@example.com' --role='roles/viewer'`)
Include examples for different binding scenarios: project-level, resource-level, service account bindings
Add a workflow with validation steps: check current bindings, apply new binding, verify the binding was applied correctly
Provide Terraform/Pulumi examples for infrastructure-as-code approaches to IAM binding management
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is padded with generic boilerplate that provides no actual information about IAM binding creation. Phrases like 'provides automated assistance' and 'follows industry best practices' are meaningless filler that waste tokens. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance - no code, no commands, no specific steps for creating IAM bindings. The skill describes what it claims to do rather than instructing how to do anything. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow is provided whatsoever. IAM binding creation involves specific steps (identifying principals, roles, resources, using gcloud commands or Terraform), none of which are mentioned or sequenced. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic block of vague descriptions with no structure pointing to detailed materials, examples, or reference documentation for GCP IAM concepts. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
b8a3b3e
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.