ideogram-ci-integration
Configure Ideogram CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing. Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, or integrating Ideogram tests into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "ideogram CI", "ideogram GitHub Actions", "ideogram automated tests", "CI ideogram".
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill ideogram-ci-integration89
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with explicit trigger guidance and clear 'Use when' clauses. The main weakness is the somewhat generic action verbs (configure, setting up) rather than listing specific concrete capabilities like creating workflow YAML files or configuring test matrices. The Ideogram-specific trigger terms provide excellent distinctiveness.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'create GitHub Actions workflow files', 'configure test matrices', 'set up secrets and environment variables' to improve specificity
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions) and some actions (configure, setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'create workflow files', 'set up test runners', or 'configure secrets'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (configure CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing) and when (setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, integrating tests into build process) with explicit 'Use when' and 'Trigger with' clauses. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases users would say: 'ideogram CI', 'ideogram GitHub Actions', 'ideogram automated tests', 'CI ideogram'. Good coverage of variations combining the product name with CI/CD terminology. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with 'Ideogram' as a specific product qualifier combined with CI/CD context. The explicit trigger phrases with 'ideogram' prefix make it unlikely to conflict with generic CI/CD skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, actionable skill with executable code examples and efficient token usage. The main weakness is the lack of explicit validation steps between workflow creation and deployment - there's no guidance on verifying the pipeline works before relying on it. The error handling table is helpful but reactive rather than preventive.
Suggestions
Add a validation step after Step 1: 'Push a test commit and verify the workflow appears in the Actions tab before proceeding'
Include a troubleshooting workflow: 'If the first run fails, check Actions logs → fix issues → re-run before configuring branch protection'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, providing only necessary configuration and code without explaining basic concepts like what GitHub Actions or CI/CD is. Every section serves a clear purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable YAML workflows, bash commands, and TypeScript test code that are copy-paste ready. Specific commands like `gh secret set` and complete workflow configurations are included. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. There's no 'verify the workflow runs successfully' step or feedback loop for troubleshooting failed pipeline runs before proceeding. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (Overview, Prerequisites, Instructions, Examples, Resources). References to external docs and related skills are one level deep and clearly signaled. Content is appropriately scoped. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.