ideogram-local-dev-loop
Configure Ideogram local development with mock responses and testing. Use when setting up a development environment, configuring test workflows, or establishing a fast iteration cycle with Ideogram. Trigger with phrases like "ideogram dev setup", "ideogram local development", "ideogram dev environment", "develop with ideogram", "ideogram testing".
61
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/ideogram-pack/skills/ideogram-local-dev-loop/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid description with clear 'when' triggers and a distinct niche around Ideogram local development. Its main weakness is that the 'what' could be more specific about the concrete actions performed (e.g., creating mock API responses, configuring environment variables, setting up test fixtures). The trigger terms are well-chosen and cover natural user phrasings.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions to the 'what' portion, e.g., 'Creates mock API responses, configures environment variables, sets up test fixtures for Ideogram local development.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It names the domain (Ideogram local development) and mentions some actions like 'configure', 'mock responses', and 'testing', but doesn't list multiple concrete specific actions (e.g., what exactly is configured, what mock responses look like, what testing entails). | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (configure Ideogram local development with mock responses and testing) and 'when' (setting up dev environment, configuring test workflows, establishing fast iteration cycle), with explicit trigger phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger phrases like 'ideogram dev setup', 'ideogram local development', 'ideogram dev environment', 'develop with ideogram', 'ideogram testing' — these are natural terms a user would say and cover good variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche — Ideogram local development with mock responses. The 'Ideogram' qualifier and focus on dev/testing setup make it highly unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides highly actionable, executable code for setting up an Ideogram local dev environment with typed client, mocks, and tests. However, it suffers from poor progressive disclosure—all code is inlined in a single large file rather than split into bundle files with references. The workflow is clearly sequenced but lacks explicit validation checkpoints to confirm the setup works at each stage.
Suggestions
Move the full type definitions, client wrapper, mock server, and test suite into separate bundle files (e.g., src/ideogram/types.ts, tests/ideogram.test.ts) and reference them from SKILL.md with brief descriptions of each file's purpose.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Step 6, e.g., 'Run `npx vitest run` — all 4 tests should pass. If not, check the error handling table below.'
Trim the SKILL.md body to a quick-start overview with the project structure, install command, and a single usage example, then point to bundle files for full implementations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly long with complete type definitions and full test files inline. While the code is useful, the types.ts and full test suite could be in separate bundle files. Some sections like the error handling table add value, but the overall length (~180 lines of code) is heavy for a SKILL.md that could reference supporting files. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every step provides fully executable, copy-paste ready TypeScript code, bash commands, and JSON configuration. The type definitions, client wrapper, mock server, tests, and package.json scripts are all complete and concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced (1-7), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints between steps. After creating files and installing dependencies, there's no 'run tests to verify setup' step or feedback loop for common setup failures. For a multi-step dev environment setup, a verification step (e.g., 'run npm test to confirm everything works') is missing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | All content is monolithically inlined in a single file with no bundle files to offload detailed code. The full type definitions, client implementation, mock server, and complete test suite should be in separate referenced files, with SKILL.md providing an overview and quick-start. The file is a wall of code blocks. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
a04d1a2
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.