CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

juicebox-common-errors

Diagnose and fix Juicebox API errors. Trigger: "juicebox error", "fix juicebox", "debug juicebox".

68

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, highly actionable error reference with concrete code, exact limits, and a working diagnostic command. Its gaps are the absence of explicit validation checkpoints for batch operations and a broken cross-reference that fails to point at the real bundle files.

Suggestions

Replace the phantom "See `juicebox-debug-bundle`" pointer with explicit links to the actual files in references/ (e.g., "See [implementation-guide.md](references/implementation-guide.md)"), and signal what each contains.

Add a short numbered troubleshooting workflow with a validation checkpoint for batch operations (e.g., upload small chunk -> verify accepted -> proceed) so quota/dataset failures include an explicit validate-fix-retry loop.

Tighten the overview by removing editorial color ("which often surprises new integrators") so every token earns its place.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and table-driven (error reference, error-handling matrix) with short focused prose and executable snippets, assuming Claude's competence rather than explaining basic API or HTTP concepts; only minor editorial color in the overview keeps it from feeling padded.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable guidance: a copy-paste curl health check, a concrete TypeScript error classifier, and exact thresholds (30 req/min, 50MB/100K-row limits, 60s timeout) with named required CSV columns, matching the score-3 anchor for copy-paste-ready specifics.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Recovery patterns are organized by error category and a diagnostic step exists, but there is no explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and the batch/dataset-upload operations lack a validate-then-retry feedback loop, so the rubric caps this at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well organized into sections, but the only next-step pointer ("See `juicebox-debug-bundle`") names a bundle that does not exist, while the actual reference files (implementation-guide.md, implementation.md) are never linked or signaled from the body, leaving references poorly navigated.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that covers both what the skill does and when to use it with natural trigger phrases. Its main weakness is that the capability statement uses only two generic verbs rather than enumerating specific concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and two actions ("Diagnose and fix Juicebox API errors"), but these are only two generic verbs rather than a list of multiple specific concrete actions, matching the score-2 anchor rather than the comprehensive score-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers both what ("Diagnose and fix Juicebox API errors") and when (an explicit "Trigger:" clause), satisfying the score-3 anchor for answering both what and when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The explicit triggers ("juicebox error", "fix juicebox", "debug juicebox") are natural phrases a user would actually say when needing this skill, giving good coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Juicebox API error niche with product-specific triggers ("juicebox error", "debug juicebox") is clearly distinguishable and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.