Diagnose and fix Juicebox API errors. Trigger: "juicebox error", "fix juicebox", "debug juicebox".
61
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/juicebox-pack/skills/juicebox-common-errors/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
57%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear niche (Juicebox API errors) and provides some trigger terms, giving it good distinctiveness. However, it lacks specificity about what concrete diagnostic or fix actions it performs, and the trigger guidance is a bare list rather than an explicit 'Use when...' clause with broader natural language coverage.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions beyond 'diagnose and fix', e.g., 'Parse Juicebox API error codes, check authentication tokens, validate request payloads, troubleshoot rate limiting and timeout issues.'
Replace the bare trigger list with a 'Use when...' clause that covers more natural user phrasings, e.g., 'Use when the user encounters Juicebox API errors, mentions Juicebox not working, reports HTTP status codes from Juicebox, or needs help debugging Juicebox integration issues.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Juicebox API) and two general actions (diagnose and fix errors), but does not list specific concrete actions like parsing error codes, checking authentication, validating endpoints, etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is present (diagnose and fix Juicebox API errors) and trigger terms are listed, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause explaining when Claude should select this skill. The trigger terms partially serve this purpose but are not framed as selection guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant trigger terms ('juicebox error', 'fix juicebox', 'debug juicebox') but misses natural variations users might say like 'Juicebox API not working', 'Juicebox 500 error', 'Juicebox timeout', or 'Juicebox authentication issue'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description is clearly scoped to Juicebox API errors specifically, which is a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills. The product name 'Juicebox' provides strong disambiguation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides a solid error reference table and useful diagnostic curl command, but suffers from significant content duplication across the error reference, debugging guide, and error handling sections. The overview explains concepts Claude doesn't need, and key recovery patterns like exponential backoff and dataset chunking lack executable code examples. Consolidating redundant sections and adding concrete implementation examples would significantly improve this skill.
Suggestions
Consolidate the error reference table, debugging guide, and error handling table into a single comprehensive reference to eliminate redundancy and save tokens.
Add executable code examples for key recovery patterns: exponential backoff for rate limits, CSV validation before upload, and dataset chunking for large files.
Remove the overview paragraph explaining what Juicebox is — Claude doesn't need this context to debug API errors.
Clarify the 'juicebox-debug-bundle' reference in Next Steps with a proper file link and brief description of what it contains.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The overview paragraph explains what Juicebox is and how its quota system works, which is somewhat unnecessary context. The debugging guide section largely repeats information already present in the error reference table, creating redundancy. The error handling table also overlaps significantly with the error reference table. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The error reference table provides concrete fixes, and the TypeScript error classifier and curl diagnostic are executable. However, the debugging guide is more descriptive than instructive, and key recovery patterns (like exponential backoff implementation, dataset chunking, or batch enrichment) lack concrete code examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The error reference and handling tables provide clear scenario-to-fix mappings, but there are no explicit multi-step workflows with validation checkpoints. For batch operations and dataset uploads (which are destructive/batch contexts), there are no feedback loops — e.g., no 'validate CSV format before uploading' step or 'check quota before starting batch' sequence. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably structured with sections, but the error reference table, debugging guide, and error handling table contain significant overlap that could be consolidated. The reference to 'juicebox-debug-bundle' in Next Steps is unclear — it's not a file link and provides no context about what it contains. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
70e9fa4
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.