CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

juicebox-debug-bundle

Collect Juicebox debug evidence. Trigger: "juicebox debug", "juicebox support ticket".

59

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable bash and TypeScript examples plus a useful diagnostic table, but it loses points on conciseness (duplicated health-check logic), workflow validation gaps, and a broken/unsurfaced reference structure.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the collection script — e.g., abort or warn if the health endpoint returns HTTP 000/401 before archiving the bundle — to lift workflow clarity.

Fix progressive disclosure: either create the referenced juicebox-common-errors file or repoint 'Next Steps' to the existing references/implementation-guide.md, and link it explicitly from the body.

Remove the duplicated health/quota logic between the bash script and the TypeScript 'Automated Health Check' (or move one into the reference file) to improve conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with executable scripts and no concept explanations, but the bash collection script and the 'Automated Health Check' TypeScript snippet duplicate the same health/quota checks, and the content overlaps with references/implementation-guide.md, so it could be tightened; not the lean score-3 case and not padded enough for score 1.

2 / 3

Actionability

Quotes executable bash with real curl endpoints, jq queries like 'jq \'{used, limit, remaining}\' .../quota.json', and a TypeScript fetch example — copy-paste ready, specific commands matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are sequenced (collect -> analyze -> diagnose via the Common Issues table), but the main bash collection script has no explicit validation checkpoint before archiving (it captures HTTP status yet never branches on failure), capping workflow clarity at 2 per the batch-operation guideline; the diagnostic table prevents a score of 1.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned and self-contained, but its only forward reference 'juicebox-common-errors' does not exist in the bundle while the actual bundle file references/implementation-guide.md is never signaled — references are present but not correctly wired, matching 'some structure but could be better organized' rather than the cleanly-signaled score-3 case.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and provides explicit trigger terms, giving it strong completeness and distinctiveness. It is slightly weak on specificity (only one action verb) and trigger variation coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Quotes 'Collect Juicebox debug evidence' — it names the domain and one concrete action but does not list multiple specific actions like the score-3 anchor; more than the vague score-1 examples but not comprehensive.

2 / 3

Completeness

Quotes 'Collect Juicebox debug evidence.' (what) and 'Trigger: "juicebox debug", "juicebox support ticket".' (when) — it explicitly answers both what and when with an explicit trigger clause, satisfying the score-3 anchor rather than the score-2 cap for missing trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes 'Trigger: "juicebox debug", "juicebox support ticket"' — these are natural phrases a user would say, but only two variations are given with no common alternates like 'juicebox error' or 'juicebox not working', matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Juicebox is a specific niche with distinct, product-specific trigger phrases, making it clearly distinguishable and unlikely to fire for the wrong skill, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.