CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

juicebox-enterprise-rbac

Configure Juicebox team access. Trigger: "juicebox rbac", "juicebox team roles".

59

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/saas-packs/juicebox-pack/skills/juicebox-enterprise-rbac/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and actionable with concrete TypeScript examples, but it duplicates material that lives in the unreferenced implementation guide and lacks explicit validation checkpoints for its destructive role-management operations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit ordered workflow with validation checkpoints for destructive operations (e.g., assign role -> verify membership via API -> confirm audit log entry -> report result) to lift workflow clarity above the destructive-skill cap.

Link references/implementation-guide.md from the body and move the duplicated role/permission/audit code there, keeping the skill body as a lean overview.

Remove or correct the "Next Steps: See juicebox-security-basics" reference, which points to a skill not present in the bundle, to avoid a dead reference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and code-forward with little tutorial padding, though the Overview paragraph carries some product/marketing context ("AI-powered people search", SOC 2 framing) that could be trimmed, landing it just below the lean anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete TypeScript snippets for permission checks, role assignment/revoke, and audit logging, but they rely on undefined globals (JUICEBOX_API, ROLE_PERMISSIONS, WORKSPACE_ID) and db/env references, leaving minor gaps below copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections are labeled and a checklist exists, but role assignment/revoke are destructive/batch operations with no sequenced validate-then-proceed feedback loop, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is present via headers and a real bundle file (references/implementation-guide.md) exists, but it is never linked from the body while overlapping content is inlined, and "Next Steps" points to a non-existent juicebox-security-basics skill.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and third-person with explicit trigger guidance, hitting both the what and when. Its main weakness is that the capability statement is a single terse action rather than a comprehensive list of what the skill does.

Suggestions

Expand the "what" to list the concrete capabilities (e.g., manage team seats, assign roles, scope dataset access, enforce audit logging) so it reaches the multi-action specificity anchor.

Add a couple more natural trigger phrases and synonyms such as "juicebox permissions" or "juicebox team access" to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Configure Juicebox team access" names the domain plus a single concrete action but does not enumerate several specific actions (e.g., manage roles, seats, permissions), so it sits at the anchor naming 1-2 actions rather than the multi-action anchors above.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states a clear "what" (Configure Juicebox team access) and an explicit "when" via the Trigger clause, but the "what" is terse with a single action, keeping it below the fully-concrete anchor 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The explicit triggers "juicebox rbac" and "juicebox team roles" are natural phrases a user would say, but coverage stops short of the comprehensive synonyms/extensions needed for a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Product-specific triggers ("juicebox rbac", "juicebox team roles") carve a clear niche with minimal risk of firing for an unrelated skill.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.