juicebox-multi-env-setup

Configure Juicebox multi-environment. Trigger: "juicebox environments", "juicebox staging".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is strong on actionability with executable config, env, and deploy snippets, and is reasonably concise. It is held back by a promotion workflow lacking explicit validation checkpoints and by broken/orphaned cross-file references that undermine progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the Promotion Workflow (e.g., 'verify resultCount <= limit before promoting', 're-run staging checks on failure') so the batch/deploy sequence reaches level-3 workflow clarity.

Link the existing references/implementation-guide.md from the body (e.g., 'See [implementation-guide.md](references/implementation-guide.md) for secret management and Kubernetes overlays') so the provided bundle is actually reachable.

Fix the dangling 'Next Steps: See juicebox-deploy-integration' reference — either point it at a real file or remove it — and avoid leaving orphaned bundle files unreferenced.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly tight and table/code-driven, but the Overview paragraph restates environment purposes and the matrix repeats config values already shown in code, so it is efficient yet could be trimmed; it does not pad with concepts Claude already knows, keeping it above level 1.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides fully executable TypeScript config and validation, concrete .env file templates, and copy-paste curl/npm deploy commands with specific headers and flags, matching 'Fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready'.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 'Promotion Workflow' lists a clear dev->staging->prod sequence with numbered steps, but it lacks explicit validation checkpoints or a retry/feedback loop for the batch/deploy operations; per the rubric, missing validation steps cap workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are reasonably organized and a bundle file exists, but the body never links to references/implementation-guide.md (it is orphaned) and 'Next Steps' points to a non-existent 'juicebox-deploy-integration', so references are present but not clearly signaled — 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear product domain and supplies a couple of trigger phrases, but it is thin: a single action, missing common trigger variations, and no explicit 'Use when...' formulation. It is serviceable but stops short of the concrete, well-triggered standard the rubric's good examples set.

Suggestions

Expand to list the concrete actions performed (e.g., 'set up isolated dev/staging/prod workspaces, toggle export and result limits per environment, and validate required API and workspace vars') to reach level-3 specificity.

Replace the bare 'Trigger:' line with an explicit 'Use when...' clause and add common variations like 'juicebox dev', 'juicebox prod', 'environment setup', and 'juicebox config'.

Tighten the description to third-person voice with one clear sentence of capability plus the 'Use when...' trigger, which currently sits awkwardly on separate lines inside the YAML string.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The phrase 'Configure Juicebox multi-environment' names a domain and a single action but does not list multiple concrete actions (e.g., set up dev/staging/prod configs, toggle export, validate vars), so it lands on 'Names domain and some actions' rather than the level-3 'lists multiple specific concrete actions'.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the skill does ('Configure Juicebox multi-environment') and provides trigger guidance via 'Trigger: ...', but the 'when' guidance is bare quoted phrases rather than an explicit 'Use when...' clause, and the wording 'Trigger:' is not the natural 'Use when Claude is asked to...' formulation the rubric rewards at level 3.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It offers 'juicebox environments' and 'juicebox staging' as explicit triggers, which are terms a user might say, but it omits common variations like 'juicebox dev', 'juicebox prod', 'environment setup', or 'juicebox config', fitting 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Configure Juicebox multi-environment' is tied to a named product so it is unlikely to conflict broadly, yet the trigger terms are narrow and could overlap with generic 'environment setup' skills, placing it at 'Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills' rather than a clearly distinct niche.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Commit: 1628598

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.