klingai-compliance-review
Execute conduct compliance reviews for Kling AI integrations. Use when preparing for audits, ensuring regulatory compliance, or reviewing security posture. Trigger with phrases like 'klingai compliance', 'kling ai audit prep', 'klingai security review', 'video generation compliance'.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill klingai-compliance-review63
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with strong completeness and distinctiveness. It clearly identifies when to use the skill and provides explicit trigger phrases. The main weakness is the lack of specific concrete actions - it describes the general purpose but not the detailed capabilities like generating reports, checking specific compliance criteria, or producing audit documentation.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 specific concrete actions such as 'generate compliance reports', 'audit API usage logs', or 'validate data retention policies' to improve specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Kling AI compliance reviews) and mentions some actions (audits, regulatory compliance, security posture review), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'generate compliance reports', 'check API permissions', or 'validate data handling policies'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (execute compliance reviews for Kling AI integrations) and when (preparing for audits, ensuring regulatory compliance, reviewing security posture) with explicit trigger phrases provided. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger phrases that users would naturally say: 'klingai compliance', 'kling ai audit prep', 'klingai security review', 'video generation compliance'. Good coverage of natural variations including the product name and domain-specific terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche targeting Kling AI specifically, with distinct triggers mentioning the product name. Unlikely to conflict with generic compliance or security skills due to the explicit 'Kling AI' and 'video generation' qualifiers. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a skeletal framework for compliance review but lacks the concrete, actionable content needed to be useful. The instructions are generic enough to apply to any compliance review, missing Kling AI-specific checklists, security criteria, or actual audit procedures. The skill describes what to do at a high level but never shows how to do it.
Suggestions
Add specific compliance checklists for Kling AI integrations (e.g., data retention policies, API key management, content moderation requirements, rate limiting verification)
Include concrete validation commands or scripts to verify compliance status (e.g., checking API configurations, reviewing access logs, validating data handling)
Provide actual gap analysis templates or criteria specific to video generation AI services rather than generic steps
Add explicit validation checkpoints between steps (e.g., 'Before proceeding to remediation, verify all gaps are documented with severity ratings')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is relatively brief but includes some unnecessary padding like the generic prerequisites section and vague instructions that don't add value specific to Kling AI compliance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The instructions are entirely abstract and vague ('Identify Requirements', 'Assess Current State') with no concrete checklists, specific compliance criteria, actual commands, or executable guidance for Kling AI specifically. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | While steps are numbered, they lack any validation checkpoints, specific criteria for completion, or feedback loops. 'Fix identified problems' and 'Prepare audit materials' provide no actionable guidance for a compliance review process. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to external files (errors.md, examples.md) are present and one-level deep, but the main content is too thin to serve as a useful overview, and the external references use placeholder paths rather than clear navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.