Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, highly actionable, and presents a clear workflow with feedback loops. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: advanced material is inlined and the bundled reference files are not surfaced from SKILL.md.
Suggestions
Link to the existing reference files from the body (e.g. 'See motion-control-options.md for camera/motion brush details', 'See batch-image-processing.md for multi-image workflows') so the bundle is discoverable.
Move the advanced variation examples (image_tail, dynamic_masks, static_mask) and the full parameter/error tables into references/ to keep SKILL.md a concise overview.
Add a brief validation note (e.g. HTTP status check, max poll attempts) to the polling loop to make the workflow's failure path more explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean tables and executable code with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready code including JWT auth, the POST request, and a polling loop, plus concrete parameter and error tables. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The basic example sequences auth → submit → poll → handle succeed/failed with an explicit status feedback loop, and error/mutual-exclusivity tables guide recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are organized, but the body inlines full API reference and multiple advanced examples while the five existing references/ files (e.g. motion-control-options.md, batch-image-processing.md) are never signaled or linked from the body. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |