managing-autonomous-development
tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill managing-autonomous-developmentExecute enables AI assistant to manage sugar's autonomous development workflows. it allows AI assistant to create tasks, view the status of the system, review pending tasks, and start autonomous execution mode. use this skill when the user asks to create a new develo... Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose.
30%
Overall
Validation
Implementation
Activation
Validation
81%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md line count is 88 (<= 500) | Pass |
frontmatter_valid | YAML frontmatter is valid | Pass |
name_field | 'name' field is valid: 'managing-autonomous-development' | Pass |
description_field | 'description' field is valid (364 chars) | Pass |
description_voice | 'description' uses third person voice | Pass |
description_trigger_hint | Description includes an explicit trigger hint | Pass |
compatibility_field | 'compatibility' field not present (optional) | Pass |
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' field not present (optional) | Pass |
license_field | 'license' field is present: MIT | Pass |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_present | SKILL.md body is present | Pass |
body_examples | Examples detected (code fence or 'Example' wording) | Pass |
body_output_format | Output/return/format terms detected | Pass |
body_steps | Step-by-step structure detected (ordered list) | Pass |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed |
Implementation
13%This skill is heavily padded with generic boilerplate and meta-explanations about how Claude processes requests, which wastes tokens on information Claude already knows. It lacks concrete, executable examples of the actual sugar CLI commands and their syntax. The content describes what the skill does rather than providing actionable instructions Claude can follow.
Suggestions
- Remove all generic boilerplate sections (Prerequisites, Instructions, Output, Error Handling, Resources) and the 'How It Works' meta-explanation - these explain Claude to Claude
- Add actual executable command examples showing the real sugar CLI syntax, e.g., `sugar task create 'Implement auth' --type feature --priority 4`
- Replace the abstract 'The skill will:' descriptions with concrete command outputs and expected responses
- Add explicit validation workflow for autonomous mode: check config -> dry-run -> review output -> execute with safeguards
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with unnecessary explanations of how Claude works ('Command Recognition', 'Parameter Extraction', 'Response Generation'). Contains generic boilerplate sections ('Prerequisites', 'Instructions', 'Output', 'Error Handling', 'Resources') that add no value and explain things Claude already knows. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No executable code or actual commands shown. Examples describe what 'the skill will' do abstractly rather than providing concrete command syntax, actual CLI usage, or copy-paste ready instructions. The actual sugar command interface is never demonstrated. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How It Works' section provides a sequence, and Best Practices mentions using '--dry-run --once' first for safety. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery steps for the autonomous execution mode which is a risky operation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with no references to external documentation. Generic placeholder sections ('Resources: Project documentation') provide no actual navigation. Content that could be split (command reference, examples) is all inline but poorly organized. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Activation
17%This description suffers from truncation and placeholder boilerplate text that renders the 'when to use' guidance completely useless. While it names some specific capabilities around autonomous workflow management, the generic trigger clause and incomplete text significantly undermine its utility for skill selection.
Suggestions
- Replace the placeholder 'Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose' with actual trigger phrases like 'Use when the user mentions sugar, autonomous tasks, workflow execution, or asks to start/stop autonomous mode'
- Complete the truncated description and ensure the full text is included
- Add natural user phrases as explicit triggers, such as 'run autonomously', 'create a task', 'check task status', 'sugar workflow'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (autonomous development workflows) and lists some actions (create tasks, view status, review pending tasks, start autonomous execution mode), but the description is truncated and uses somewhat vague terms like 'manage' without fully concrete details. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | While the 'what' is partially addressed, the 'when' clause is completely boilerplate placeholder text ('Use when appropriate context detected') that provides no actual guidance. The description is also truncated mid-sentence ('develo...'). | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The generic placeholder text 'Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose' provides zero actual trigger terms. Natural keywords like 'task', 'workflow', 'autonomous', 'execute' are buried in the capability description but not explicitly called out as triggers. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | References a specific system ('sugar') and specific concept ('autonomous development workflows'), which provides some distinctiveness, but terms like 'create tasks' and 'view status' are generic enough to potentially conflict with project management or task tracking skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.