This skill enables Claude to design, execute, and analyze performance tests using the performance-test-suite plugin. It is activated when the user requests load testing, stress testing, spike testing, or endurance testing, and when discussing performance metrics such as response time, throughput, and error rates. It identifies performance bottlenecks related to CPU, memory, database, or network issues. The plugin provides comprehensive reporting, including percentiles, graphs, and recommendations.
92
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.00xAverage score across 9 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./backups/skills-migration-20251108-070147/plugins/testing/performance-test-suite/skills/performance-test-suite/SKILL.mdTest type selection and parameter configuration
Load test identified
100%
100%
Target users specified
100%
100%
Ramp-up time specified
100%
100%
Test duration specified
100%
100%
Response time metric
100%
100%
Throughput metric
100%
100%
Error rate metric
100%
100%
Multiple configurations
100%
100%
Realistic usage patterns
100%
100%
Results inform next test
100%
100%
Bottleneck categories mentioned
100%
100%
Bottleneck identification and report generation
Percentile reporting
100%
100%
Response time analysis
100%
100%
Throughput analysis
100%
100%
Error rate analysis
100%
100%
CPU bottleneck identified
100%
100%
Database bottleneck identified
100%
100%
Memory trend noted
100%
100%
Graph or visualization
100%
100%
Recommendations present
100%
100%
KPI summary
100%
100%
Breaking point identified
100%
100%
Iterative multi-test strategy design
Spike test identified
100%
100%
Endurance test identified
100%
100%
Spike ramp parameters
100%
100%
Endurance duration
100%
100%
Target user counts
100%
100%
Response time metric
100%
100%
Error rate metric
100%
100%
Memory metric
100%
100%
Multiple test types
100%
100%
Test sequencing rationale
100%
100%
Realistic scenario design
100%
100%
Pass/fail criteria
100%
100%
Stress test design and breaking point identification
Stress test identified
100%
100%
Gradually increasing load
100%
100%
Breaking point identification method
100%
100%
Response time metric
100%
100%
Error rate metric
100%
100%
Throughput metric
100%
100%
At least one additional metric category
100%
100%
Concrete pass/fail thresholds
100%
100%
Target user counts specified
100%
100%
Degradation vs failure distinction
100%
100%
Test duration specified
100%
100%
Realistic user flow scenario design
User flow design
100%
100%
Traffic distribution
100%
100%
Load test type chosen
100%
100%
Response time metric
100%
100%
Throughput metric
100%
100%
Error rate metric
100%
100%
Additional metric breadth
100%
100%
Per-endpoint breakdown
100%
100%
Target user count specified
100%
100%
Ramp-up specified
100%
100%
Test duration specified
100%
100%
Bottleneck interpretation
100%
100%
Post-deployment performance regression validation
Baseline comparison methodology
100%
100%
Matching test conditions
100%
100%
Percentile reporting in report
100%
100%
Visualization present
100%
100%
Pass/fail verdict
100%
100%
Per-metric thresholds
100%
100%
Recommendations included
100%
100%
Response time metrics present
100%
100%
Error rate metric present
100%
100%
Throughput metric present
100%
100%
KPI summary section
100%
100%
Endurance test design for long-running service stability
Endurance test type named
100%
100%
Extended duration configured
100%
100%
Memory metric specified
100%
100%
Gradual degradation detection method
100%
100%
Response time metric included
100%
100%
Error rate metric included
100%
100%
Database metric included
100%
100%
Concurrent users configured
100%
100%
Realistic traffic pattern
100%
100%
Pass/fail threshold defined
100%
100%
Recommendations present
100%
100%
test_config.json produced
100%
100%
Network bottleneck identification and cross-service report
Network bottleneck identified
100%
100%
Percentile analysis included
100%
100%
Visualization present
100%
100%
Error rate analysis
100%
100%
Throughput analysis
100%
100%
CPU and memory ruled out
100%
100%
Holistic metric coverage
100%
100%
Specific recommendations
100%
100%
Executive summary or KPI section
100%
100%
Per-service breakdown
100%
100%
Root cause analysis
100%
100%
Multi-run performance trend analysis and iterative strategy
Percentile trend analysis
100%
100%
Trend visualization
100%
100%
Throughput trend analyzed
100%
100%
Error rate trend analyzed
100%
100%
Remaining bottleneck identified
100%
100%
Bottleneck category named
100%
100%
Holistic metric coverage
100%
100%
Recommendations provided
100%
100%
KPI or executive summary
100%
100%
Results inform next test
100%
100%
next_test_config.json valid
100%
100%
Improvement quantified
100%
100%
c8a915c
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.