response-schema-generator
Response Schema Generator - Auto-activating skill for API Development. Triggers on: response schema generator, response schema generator Part of the API Development skill category.
36
Quality
3%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.01xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/15-api-development/response-schema-generator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
7%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is essentially a placeholder that provides almost no useful information for skill selection. It relies entirely on the skill name without explaining capabilities, use cases, or natural trigger terms. The redundant trigger terms and boilerplate structure suggest auto-generated content that needs substantial human refinement.
Suggestions
Add specific actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Generates JSON/OpenAPI response schemas, defines data types and validation rules, creates example responses for API endpoints'
Replace redundant trigger terms with natural variations users would say: 'API response format', 'JSON schema', 'response model', 'output structure', 'define API response'
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause: 'Use when designing API responses, defining output formats, creating OpenAPI specifications, or when the user needs to structure API return data'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only states 'Response Schema Generator' without describing any concrete actions. It doesn't explain what generating a response schema actually involves (e.g., creating JSON schemas, defining data types, validating structures). | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond the name itself, and provides no 'when should Claude use it' guidance. The 'Triggers on' section just repeats the skill name rather than providing meaningful trigger scenarios. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms are redundant ('response schema generator' repeated twice) and overly specific. Missing natural variations users might say like 'API response format', 'JSON schema', 'define response structure', 'output schema', or 'response model'. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'Response Schema Generator' is somewhat specific to API development, the lack of detail about what distinguishes it from other API-related skills (request schemas, API documentation, endpoint design) creates potential overlap risk. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is an empty template with no substantive content. It describes capabilities in abstract terms without providing any actual guidance, code examples, schema formats, or workflows for generating response schemas. The content would be useless to Claude as it contains nothing actionable or specific to the task.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples showing how to generate response schemas (e.g., JSON Schema, OpenAPI response definitions) with actual code snippets
Include specific schema patterns for common response types (success, error, paginated, etc.) with copy-paste ready templates
Define a clear workflow: identify response structure → choose schema format → generate schema → validate against examples
Remove all generic boilerplate ('provides automated assistance', 'follows best practices') and replace with specific, actionable instructions
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is padded with generic boilerplate that explains nothing specific. Phrases like 'provides automated assistance' and 'follows industry best practices' are filler that Claude doesn't need and add no actionable value. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, schemas, or examples are provided. The skill describes what it does abstractly ('generates production-ready code') but never shows how to actually generate a response schema or what one looks like. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow or steps are defined. The content mentions 'step-by-step guidance' but provides none. There are no sequences, validation checkpoints, or any process to follow. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No structure beyond generic headings. No references to detailed documentation, examples, or related files. The content is a shallow placeholder with no depth or navigation to additional resources. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
0c08951
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.