Response Schema Generator - Auto-activating skill for API Development. Triggers on: response schema generator, response schema generator Part of the API Development skill category.
36
3%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.01xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/15-api-development/response-schema-generator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
7%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is essentially a template placeholder that restates the skill name without providing any meaningful detail about capabilities, use cases, or natural trigger terms. It fails to help Claude distinguish when to select this skill, as it lacks concrete actions, natural user language, and explicit 'when to use' guidance. The duplicate trigger term suggests auto-generated content with no human refinement.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions such as 'Generates JSON response schemas for REST API endpoints, creates OpenAPI response definitions, validates response structures against specifications'.
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms like 'Use when the user asks to define API response formats, create JSON schemas for endpoints, generate OpenAPI response objects, or structure API output definitions'.
Remove the duplicate trigger term and replace with varied natural phrases users would actually say, such as 'API response format', 'JSON schema', 'endpoint response definition', 'response body structure'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description names a domain ('API Development') and a concept ('Response Schema Generator') but does not describe any concrete actions. There are no specific capabilities listed like 'generates JSON schemas', 'validates response formats', or 'creates OpenAPI response definitions'. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond restating the skill name, and the 'when' clause is just a mechanical 'Triggers on' with the skill name repeated. There is no explicit 'Use when...' guidance with meaningful trigger scenarios. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms are just 'response schema generator' repeated twice. This is not how users naturally phrase requests — they might say 'create a response schema', 'define API response format', 'JSON schema for endpoint response', etc. The repetition adds no value and natural variations are entirely missing. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The term 'Response Schema Generator' is somewhat specific to a niche (generating response schemas for APIs), which provides some distinctiveness. However, the lack of concrete detail means it could overlap with general API development, schema validation, or OpenAPI specification skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is an empty template with no substantive content. It repeatedly references 'response schema generator' without providing any actual instructions, code examples, schema formats, or actionable guidance. It fails on every dimension because it contains no real knowledge that would help Claude perform response schema generation tasks.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable code examples showing how to generate response schemas (e.g., JSON Schema, OpenAPI response objects) with specific input/output pairs.
Define a clear workflow: e.g., 1) Analyze endpoint requirements, 2) Define response structure, 3) Generate schema in target format, 4) Validate schema against spec.
Include specific schema formats and patterns (e.g., OpenAPI 3.0 response object structure, JSON Schema for common patterns like pagination, error responses, envelope patterns).
Remove all boilerplate sections (Purpose, When to Use, Example Triggers) that add no actionable information and replace with actual technical content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is entirely filler and boilerplate. It repeats 'response schema generator' numerous times without adding any actual knowledge or instructions that Claude doesn't already know. Every section restates the same vague information. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance—no code examples, no commands, no schema formats, no specific steps for generating response schemas. The content only describes what the skill supposedly does without actually doing or teaching anything. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow, steps, or process is defined. The skill claims to provide 'step-by-step guidance' but contains none. There are no validation checkpoints or any sequenced instructions. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a flat, repetitive document with no meaningful structure. There are no references to detailed files, no layered content organization, and the sections are superficial headers over vacuous content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
4dee593
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.