tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill running-smoke-testsThis skill runs smoke tests to verify critical application functionality. It executes pre-defined test suites that check system health, authentication, core features, and external integrations. Use this skill after deployments, upgrades, or significant configuration changes to ensure the application is operational. Trigger this skill using the terms "smoke test" or "st".
Validation
81%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
body_output_format | No obvious output/return/format terms detected; consider specifying expected outputs | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
7%This skill content describes what smoke testing is and when to use it, but fails to provide any actionable implementation details. It lacks executable code, actual test commands, configuration examples, or references to test suite definitions. The content reads like documentation about the concept rather than instructions Claude can follow.
Suggestions
Add executable commands showing how to actually run the smoke test suite (e.g., `pytest tests/smoke/ -v` or a specific script path)
Include the actual test suite configuration or reference a file containing test definitions that Claude should execute
Remove conceptual explanations ('What is a smoke test', 'When to use') and replace with concrete implementation: test file locations, expected output formats, and pass/fail criteria
Add error handling guidance: what to do when specific tests fail, how to interpret results, and next steps for common failure scenarios
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is verbose and explains concepts Claude already knows (what smoke tests are, when to use them). It describes rather than instructs, with sections like 'How It Works' and 'When to Use' that add little actionable value. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, or executable guidance is provided. The skill describes what will happen conceptually but never shows actual test commands, configuration files, or how to define/run the test suite. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How It Works' section lists abstract steps without any actual implementation details. There are no validation checkpoints, no error handling guidance, and no concrete sequence Claude can follow to execute tests. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is organized into logical sections with clear headers, but it's a monolithic description without references to actual test configurations, scripts, or detailed documentation that would be needed for implementation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Activation
85%This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly explains what the skill does (smoke testing for critical functionality) and when to use it (after deployments/upgrades). The description uses proper third-person voice and provides explicit trigger terms. The main weakness is limited trigger term coverage - it could benefit from additional natural language variations users might employ.
Suggestions
Expand trigger terms to include common variations like 'sanity check', 'health check', 'verify deployment', 'post-deployment test', or 'system verification'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'runs smoke tests', 'executes pre-defined test suites', and specifies what is checked: 'system health, authentication, core features, and external integrations'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (runs smoke tests, executes test suites checking health/auth/features/integrations) AND when (after deployments, upgrades, or configuration changes) with explicit trigger terms provided. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit triggers 'smoke test' and 'st', but missing common variations users might say like 'sanity check', 'health check', 'verify deployment', or 'post-deployment test'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on smoke testing with distinct triggers ('smoke test', 'st') and specific use cases (post-deployment verification); unlikely to conflict with general testing or other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.