Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with strong validation checkpoints, but it is weakened by phase detail that duplicates the reference file and by orphaned bundle files (errors.md, examples.md) that the body never navigates to.
Suggestions
Shorten the inline phase descriptions to brief summaries that defer full detail to sprint-phases.md, removing the duplication and tightening token use.
Link errors.md and examples.md from the body (e.g., in Error Handling and Examples sections) instead of maintaining parallel inline content, so every bundle file is reachable one level deep.
Move the inline Error Handling table and Examples into their corresponding reference files, keeping the body as an overview that points to them.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but the six phase descriptions repeat much of what the linked sprint-phases.md reference already covers, so it could be tightened into shorter summaries that defer detail to the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — specific file paths (`.claude/sprint/[N]/specs.md`), named agents (`python-dev`, `qa-test-agent`), and runnable commands (`/sprint:new`, `/sprint`) — plus a concrete error-handling table. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six phases are clearly sequenced with an explicit review/validation checkpoint in Phase 4 and a 5-iteration convergence cap that pauses for manual intervention, providing the feedback loop the batch/iteration context requires. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | sprint-phases.md is clearly signaled one level deep, but errors.md and examples.md exist in references/ and are never linked from the body, while inline Error Handling and Examples sections duplicate content that should be split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |