styled-components-helper
Styled Components Helper - Auto-activating skill for Frontend Development. Triggers on: styled components helper, styled components helper Part of the Frontend Development skill category.
32
0%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.00xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/05-frontend-dev/styled-components-helper/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
0%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an extremely weak description that functions essentially as a placeholder. It provides no concrete actions, no natural trigger terms beyond the skill's own name, and no guidance on when Claude should select it. It reads like auto-generated boilerplate rather than a useful skill description.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates and refactors styled-components, converts CSS/SCSS to styled-components syntax, sets up ThemeProvider configurations, and generates responsive styled component patterns.'
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about styled-components, CSS-in-JS, component-level styling in React, theme providers, or converting plain CSS to styled-components.'
Include common file types and technology variations users might mention, such as '.tsx', '.jsx', 'emotion', 'CSS-in-JS', 'tagged template literals', or 'React styling'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description contains no concrete actions whatsoever. It only names itself ('Styled Components Helper') and mentions 'Frontend Development' as a category, but never describes what it actually does—no verbs like 'creates', 'converts', 'generates', or any specific capabilities. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer both 'what does this do' and 'when should Claude use it'. There is no explanation of capabilities and no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent guidance. The 'Triggers on' line is just the skill name repeated, not meaningful trigger guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The only trigger terms listed are 'styled components helper' repeated twice. Users would naturally say things like 'styled-components', 'CSS-in-JS', 'component styling', 'React styles', or 'theme provider', none of which are present. The trigger terms are overly specific to the skill name rather than natural user language. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'styled components' is a somewhat specific technology, the description is so vague ('Frontend Development' category, no concrete actions) that it could easily conflict with any CSS, React, or frontend styling skill. There's nothing to distinguish what this skill does versus a general CSS helper or React component skill. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is an empty placeholder that provides no actual technical content about styled-components. It consists entirely of generic meta-descriptions and trigger phrases, offering nothing actionable, concrete, or useful. It fails on every dimension because it teaches Claude nothing it doesn't already know and provides no executable guidance.
Suggestions
Replace the entire body with actual styled-components guidance: include executable code examples showing component creation, theming, dynamic props, and common patterns (e.g., `const Button = styled.button`...`)
Add concrete workflow steps for common tasks like setting up a theme provider, creating reusable styled components, migrating from CSS modules, or implementing responsive styles with media queries
Remove all meta-description sections ('When to Use', 'Example Triggers', 'Capabilities') that describe the skill abstractly—instead, use that space for actual technical content like code snippets and pattern examples
If advanced topics exist (SSR with styled-components, performance optimization, CSS-in-JS migration), add brief references to separate files rather than leaving the skill as a content-free shell
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is entirely filler and meta-description. It explains what the skill does in abstract terms without providing any actual technical content. Every section restates the same vague idea ('styled components helper') without adding substance. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance—no code examples, no commands, no specific patterns, no API references. The skill describes rather than instructs, offering only vague promises like 'provides step-by-step guidance' without actually providing any. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow, steps, or process is defined. The content contains no sequenced instructions, no validation checkpoints, and no actionable procedure for any styled-components task. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic block of generic placeholder text with no references to detailed materials, no links to examples or advanced guides, and no meaningful structural organization of content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3076d78
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.