styled-components-helper
Styled Components Helper - Auto-activating skill for Frontend Development. Triggers on: styled components helper, styled components helper Part of the Frontend Development skill category.
32
0%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.00xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/05-frontend-dev/styled-components-helper/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
0%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is essentially a placeholder with no substantive content. It provides only the skill name, a duplicated trigger phrase, and a broad category label, failing to describe any concrete capabilities, use cases, or natural trigger terms. It would be nearly impossible for Claude to correctly select this skill from a pool of alternatives.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates styled-components from CSS, converts inline styles to styled-components, generates theme configurations, and builds reusable styled component patterns.'
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about styled-components, CSS-in-JS, React component styling, ThemeProvider setup, or converting CSS to styled-components.'
Remove the duplicate trigger term and replace with varied natural keywords users would actually say, such as 'styled-components', 'CSS-in-JS', 'component styles', 'React styling', 'theme provider', '.styled.ts'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description contains no concrete actions whatsoever. It only names itself ('Styled Components Helper') and mentions 'Frontend Development' as a category, but never describes what it actually does—no verbs like 'creates', 'converts', 'generates', or any specific capabilities. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer both 'what does this do' and 'when should Claude use it'. There is no explanation of capabilities and no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance. It is essentially just a title and category label. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The only trigger terms listed are 'styled components helper' repeated twice. Users would naturally say things like 'styled-components', 'CSS-in-JS', 'component styling', 'React styles', or 'theme provider', none of which are present. The trigger is the skill's own name rather than natural user language. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description is so vague that it could overlap with any frontend or CSS-related skill. 'Frontend Development' is extremely broad, and without specific actions or file types mentioned, there's nothing to distinguish this from other styling or component skills. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is an empty placeholder that provides no actual technical content about styled-components. It consists entirely of generic meta-descriptions and trigger phrases without any actionable guidance, code examples, or concrete instructions. It would be completely unhelpful to Claude in performing any styled-components task.
Suggestions
Replace the generic meta-description with actual styled-components code examples (e.g., creating a styled component, theming with ThemeProvider, dynamic props, extending styles).
Add concrete, executable code snippets showing common patterns like `const Button = styled.button`...`` with props interpolation, theme usage, and CSS helper functions.
Include a quick-start section with a minimal working example and link to separate files for advanced patterns (e.g., global styles, SSR setup, animation patterns).
Remove all 'When to Use' and 'Example Triggers' sections—these waste tokens on meta-information that provides no value to Claude's task execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is entirely filler and meta-description. It explains what the skill does in abstract terms without providing any actual technical content. Every section restates the same vague idea ('styled components helper') without adding substance. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance—no code examples, no commands, no specific patterns, no API references. The skill describes rather than instructs, offering only vague promises like 'provides step-by-step guidance' without actually providing any. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow, steps, or process is defined. The content contains no sequenced instructions, no validation checkpoints, and no actionable procedure for any styled-components task. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic block of generic placeholder text with no references to detailed materials, no links to examples or advanced guides, and no meaningful structural organization of content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
3e83543
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.