Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable commands and a clear sequenced workflow supported by an error-recovery table. It is slightly verbose due to command repetition and a long output example, and it carries one broken reference (config/settings.yaml) that keeps progressive disclosure from scoring higher.
Suggestions
Remove or deduplicate the 'Examples' section commands that already appear in 'Instructions' to tighten token usage.
Delete the config/settings.yaml reference from Resources (the file does not exist) or add the file so no references are dangling.
Consider shortening the illustrative output block or moving it to references/examples.md to keep SKILL.md a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Examples' section repeats portfolio_tracker.py invocations already shown in Instructions, and the illustrative output block is fairly long, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready with specific flags (--holdings, --detailed, --format, --output, --sort, --threshold), matching the anchor for concrete, executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (assess intent, run tracker, export, present) is clearly sequenced, and the Error Handling table provides recovery guidance; as a read-only analysis tool it does not require the validation checkpoints mandated for destructive or batch operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with one-level-deep, well-signaled references (implementation.md, errors.md, examples.md) that all exist, but the Resources section also references config/settings.yaml which is not present in the bundle, leaving a dangling pointer. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |