Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable command reference with clear prerequisites, output descriptions, error recovery, and appropriately placed one-level-deep references. Main gaps are the inconsistent working-directory setup, broken continuous list numbering across sections, and bundle-level hygiene issues (an orphaned, mismatched implementation.md and a dangling config/settings.yaml reference).
Suggestions
State the working-directory requirement once globally (e.g. in Prerequisites) or prefix every wallet_auditor.py invocation with cd ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts so all commands are copy-paste runnable.
Fix the markdown list numbering, which continues across sections (items 1-23), so each Options/Analyzes/Detects list restarts at 1.
Remove or rewrite references/implementation.md — it is unreferenced and its content (exchange APIs, trading signals, crypto:wallet-* MCP calls) does not match this read-only wallet auditor — and fix errors.md's reference to the nonexistent config/settings.yaml.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean command reference with no re-teaching of concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its tokens. Not 5: the Error Handling table duplicates content already delegated to references/errors.md, and the ASCII-art output mock in the Output section is dispensable illustration. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable with real flags (--chain, --verbose, --json, --output) and copy-paste examples using a real address (0xd8dA...6045). Not 5: "cd ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts" appears only in section 1, so commands in sections 2-7 fail if followed literally from a fresh shell. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The read-only disclaimer, prerequisites, seven well-specified subcommands, expected outputs, and an error-cause-solution table give a clear structure with recovery guidance (the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply to a read-only analyzer). Not 5: commands are documented individually without sequencing them into an audit flow (scan -> score -> revoke-list -> report), and the list numbering runs continuously (1-23) across sections, muddying the structure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is appropriately split: commands and score breakdowns inline, details clearly signaled one level deep to references/errors.md and references/examples.md, both of which exist. Not 5: references/implementation.md is an orphan (never referenced, and its content — exchange APIs, trading signals, crypto:wallet-* MCP calls, crypto-reports/ — belongs to a different skill), and errors.md points to a nonexistent config/settings.yaml. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |