Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally tight, gate-focused skill body: every line is operational, the push workflow is fully sequenced with validation checkpoints and a confirmation gate, and hard rules cover failure and concurrency edge cases. The single gap is the absence of the concrete commands behind each named gate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 22-line body is lean throughout — "Gate, then ship." opens with zero padding and every rule is operational ("no secrets in the diff, no blocked files committed"). Matches the score-5 anchor: assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directives throughout — "lint · typecheck · build · tests · a quick security sweep", "via AskUserQuestion — binary Push / Hold", "git push the branch (never --force to main/master)" — noticeably exceed the score-4 anchor. Held at 4 rather than 5 only because the per-gate runner commands are unspecified, so the gate step is not copy-paste executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: gates "run in order, fix or halt on failure", results reported per gate, and a binary Push/Hold confirmation gate before the risky operation, plus hard rules for failure modes ("your commits stay clean and local until the tree is green"). Matches the score-5 anchor with an explicit error-recovery loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into clean Steps and Hard Rules sections, and its single external pointer ("Follow the hyperflow doctrine") is clearly signaled and one level deep. Per the guideline for simple skills with no external references, matches the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |