Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable distribution playbook with concrete templates, hard constraints, and a clear step sequence. Its main weaknesses are a broken dependency on a missing docs/output-kit.md that the output format relies on, an unexplained /atlas-report escape hatch, and a few lines of padding.
Suggestions
docs/output-kit.md is referenced in the opening line but does not exist in the bundle — either ship it (e.g. as references/output-kit.md) or inline the essential output-format rules (40-line cap, box-drawing skeleton, severity indicators) so the skill is self-contained.
Explain or remove the '/atlas-report' delegation in the Delivery section — as written it names a resource with no context on what it is or where it lives.
Trim channel-culture commentary that duplicates the templates' bracketed guidance (e.g. the LinkedIn preamble) and replace one placeholder-only template with a short worked example to lock the expected voice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with earned tokens — channel-fit matrix, per-channel templates with hard constraints ('≤80 chars, no marketing', '5-8 tweets', '150-200 words'), and a concrete find command. A few lines could be trimmed (e.g., 'LinkedIn rewards longer posts and personal framing' restates what the template's bracketed guidance already implies), which fits anchor 4 ('efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed') better than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly executable: exact character limits, tweet-by-tweet thread skeleton, per-subreddit structure, a copy-paste find command, and a day-by-day timing cadence. It falls short of anchor 5 mainly because the stated output format depends on 'docs/output-kit.md' ('40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose') — a file that does not exist in the bundle, leaving the actual output format underspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-4 form a coherent sequence (gather context → score channels → write per-channel copy → repurposing → timing) with checkpoints like 'Read sub rules before posting' and 'explain why the others are skipped'. No destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies, but there are no feedback loops (e.g., how to adjust if a channel underperforms beyond the single Day 7 re-engage), which keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single SKILL.md with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories, yet the body points to 'docs/output-kit.md' and '/atlas-report' — the former is absent from the bundle, making the one external reference broken rather than clearly signaled. Structure of the inline content is decent but the dangling reference and undocumented delegation anchor it at 3 ('some structure; references present but not clearly signaled'). | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |