Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, well-gated design workflow with concrete commands, templates, and numeric thresholds throughout. Its main weakness is structural: it leans on an output-format file that is not present in the bundle, and everything lives inline in a single long SKILL.md rather than being split into reference files.
Suggestions
Ship docs/output-kit.md in the bundle (e.g. under references/) or inline the essential output-format rules (40-line budget, box-drawing skeleton, severity indicators) so the required format is actually reachable — right now Step "Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md" points at a missing file.
Move the lookup tables (freemium model comparison, viral-surface K-factor estimates) into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Trim the motivational restatements ("The rationale is not optional…", "PLG on top of broken activation burns runway") — the operative rules they reinforce are already stated once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and operational — tables, thresholds, and fill-in templates with no beginner-concept padding — but contains a few motivational restatements that could be trimmed, e.g. "The rationale is not optional. If you can't explain why the ceiling is set where it is, the tier design is wrong" and "PLG on top of broken activation burns runway". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete and executable: copy-paste-ready grep scans in Step 0, complete fill-in output templates (FREE TIER INCLUDES, TRIGGER/CONTEXT/UPGRADE COPY, LOOP design), and specific numeric anchors throughout ("Activation rate ≥ 40%", "Time-to-value ≤ 10 minutes", K-factor "0.1–0.5", "10–15% of users" per step). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: a ✓/✗ readiness table with per-row remediation, a hard stop rule ("If not ready, produce the activation fix plan instead and stop"), a self-serve activation gates checklist requiring fixes for unmet gates, and a ranking rule for triggers. Checklists and gate/stop logic match the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure within the single file is clear, but the body depends on "docs/output-kit.md" and "/atlas-report", neither of which exists in the bundle — a dangling reference for the required output format — and all reference material (model tables, K-factor estimates) is inlined in one ~230-line file with no bundle files provided. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |