Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with executable commands, a validated consent workflow, and one-level-deep references to real bundle files. The only weakness is mild verbosity in the User Input Tools and Authentication sections.
Suggestions
Tighten the "User Input Tools" section to a compact rule list; the runtime-substitution note can be one line instead of three numbered items plus a caveat.
Trim the Authentication aside about CDP session reuse vs. Chrome DevTools MCP --autoConnect to a single sentence, since it explains context Claude can infer.
Consider moving the full Options/Models/Environment Variables tables into a separate REFERENCE.md and linking from the body to reduce the inline token footprint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tables and executable examples, but sections like "User Input Tools" and the Authentication CDP-reuse aside include explanation that could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ("${BUN_X} {baseDir}/scripts/main.ts --prompt ... --image cat.png") plus full options, models, and env-var tables give fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The consent-check flow is a clearly sequenced multi-step process with explicit branching (valid consent → proceed; none → ask; decline → stop), and the script-execution instructions are numbered 1–4. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Script Reference table points one level deep to real bundle files (scripts/main.ts, scripts/gemini-webapi/*) that exist on disk, and content is organized into clear navigable sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |