Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, self-contained redirect skill with concrete copy-paste response templates and clear triggers, but it leans on redundant emphatic directives that add tokens without adding clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated STOP/REDIRECT/DO-NOT-HANDLE emphatic directives into a single concise instruction to recover token budget.
Add one line of guidance for edge cases (e.g., user insists on inline editing) so the action is fully unambiguous.
Deduplicate the trigger list against the frontmatter description so the same conditions are not stated twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no concept over-explanation, but the redundant emphatic phrasing ('CRITICAL RULE: ABSOLUTELY NO SELF-PROCESSING', 'STOP IMMEDIATELY', 'REDIRECT USER IMMEDIATELY', 'DO NOT HANDLE YOURSELF') repeats the same instruction multiple ways and could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready redirect response templates in both Chinese and English plus explicit trigger conditions; minor gaps include no guidance for edge cases such as a user who insists on inline handling. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single redirect action is unambiguous with a clear trigger list and language-specific templates; the three 'steps' (STOP/REDIRECT/DO NOT HANDLE) restate one action rather than forming a true sequenced workflow with checkpoints, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, under-50-line skill with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Critical Rule, Trigger Conditions, Standard Response Template) — meets the simple-skill exception for well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |