Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced behavioral skill with strong validation checkpoints and concrete examples. The main weakness is repetition of the same forbidden-phrase examples across multiple sections, which inflates the token budget without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the '你说得太对了/好观点/感谢' forbidden-phrase examples into one canonical list and reference it from 确认正确的反馈 and 真实案例 instead of repeating them.
The 真实案例 section reuses the 不明确项 example already shown in 处理不明确的反馈; drop the duplicate or replace it with a distinct case.
Merge '禁止的回应' into '响应模式' or '确认正确的反馈' to reduce section count and cross-section redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, but the forbidden '你说得太对了/好观点' examples recur across 禁止的回应, 确认正确的反馈, and 真实案例, which is unnecessary redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete ✅/❌ dialogue examples, a copy-paste GitHub replies command, a YAGNI grep procedure, and specific push-back conditions give fully actionable, ready-to-use guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step response model, implementation order with per-item testing and regression verification, the 5-check external-reviewer list, and the self-correction feedback loop provide explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and logically ordered in a self-contained file with no need for external references, but the skill exceeds 50 lines and has minor redundancy between sections, so it is not a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |