Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable four-phase debugging workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and well-signaled shallow references. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity from restating obvious debugging basics that Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim obvious sub-bullets under 阅读错误信息 (e.g. "不要跳过错误或警告", "完整阅读堆栈跟踪") since Claude already knows to read error messages fully.
Consider moving the full multi-component instrumentation bash example into a referenced file and keeping only the decision pattern inline, to reduce token weight in the overview.
Tighten the 常见借口 table or the 常见情况 lists where the same point is restated across sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient process discipline (red lines, thresholds, excuses table) that Claude would not reliably self-impose, but padded with some obvious sub-bullets like "不要跳过错误或警告" and "完整阅读堆栈跟踪" that explain basics Claude already knows. Not 1 because it is not explaining what a library/format is; not 3 because several passages could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: numbered steps, an executable multi-layer bash instrumentation example (echo, env, security list-keychains, codesign --verbose=4), and specific numeric thresholds (3 次或以上 → 质疑架构). Not 2 because the code block is real and copy-paste adaptable rather than pseudocode, and the rules are concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced phases with an explicit gate ("你必须完成每个阶段后才能进入下一个"), feedback loops (生效→下一阶段；没生效→新假设), verification checkpoints, and a quick-reference checklist table. Not 2 because validation is explicit and woven throughout rather than only listed with gaps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md acts as a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references under 辅助技术 (root-cause-tracing.md, defense-in-depth.md, condition-based-waiting.md), each given a one-line description. Not 2 because references are clearly signaled and shallow rather than nested or vague; the body length is well-sectioned. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |