Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, clearly sequenced workflow with strong validation checkpoints, held back by repetition across the quick-reference/mistakes/red-lines sections and the absence of any file-based progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 快速参考 table, 常见错误, and 红线 sections — they restate the step guidance; consolidate into one compact reference to reclaim tokens.
Consider moving the 常见错误 / 红线 detail into a separate reference file (e.g., references/pitfalls.md) referenced once from the body, giving the overview a leaner one-level-deep structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concept-explanation fluff, but the 快速参考 table, 常见错误, and 红线 sections restate the same guidance already in 步骤 0–3, adding length without new information; it is not a 1 because no basic concepts are over-explained. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable bash throughout — `git rev-parse`, `git check-ignore`, `git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"`, and concrete per-language setup commands — fully concrete rather than descriptive. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences 步骤 0→1a→1b→2→3 with explicit validation checkpoints (submodule guard, check-ignore before creation, baseline test verification) and feedback loops (report-and-ask on test failure, sandbox fallback), matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections but the ~225-line body is a single monolithic file with no one-level-deep external references to split detail into, so it does not meet the score-3 'appropriately split / well-signaled references' bar; it is not a 1 because the sectioning itself is clean. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |