Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable verification rule with a clear gated workflow and feedback loops. Its main weakness is verbosity from heavy restatement of one principle across several overlapping sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the near-duplicate '常见失败模式' and '防止合理化' tables into a single table to reduce restatement of the same verification principle.
Merge or trim the '铁律' and '门控函数' sections, since the gating function already states the rule as a procedure.
Cut redundant red-line/anti-rationalization entries that repeat the same idea (e.g. '应该' appears in multiple forms) to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body restates the single verification-before-claiming principle many times across overlapping sections ('铁律', '门控函数', '红线', '防止合理化', and the near-duplicate '常见失败模式'/'防止合理化' tables), so while not explaining foreign concepts, it is padded and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance — a specific 5-step gating procedure, exact evidence requirements ('测试命令输出：0 failures'), and ✅/❌ pattern examples — which is specific and actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step gating function is a clear sequence with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops (the '如果否/如果是' branch in step 4 and the red-green regression loop), matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body contains no file references; as a single self-contained, well-sectioned skill it qualifies for the simple-skill allowance scoring 3 without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |