Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured behavioral skill: the gated 5-step procedure, claim→evidence table, and ✅/❌ patterns make the rule directly executable, and validation with feedback loops is intrinsic to the design. The main cost is redundancy — the 红线 and 防止合理化 sections substantially restate content from 常见失败模式, adding tokens without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Merge 红线 and 防止合理化 into a single table (信号 | 借口 | 应对) — they currently restate the same failure modes (agent reports, linter≠compiler, partial checks) in two formats, cutting ~20 lines.
Drop duplicated rows from 防止合理化 that already appear verbatim in 常见失败模式 (e.g. "代理报告成功" vs "代理说成功了") and keep one canonical table of rationalizations.
Tighten 关键模式 examples that restate table rows (构建/Linter and 代理委派 patterns repeat 常见失败模式 content); keeping the table plus one composite worked example would preserve the teaching value at lower token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean but repeats the same discipline across overlapping sections: the agent-trust rule appears in 常见失败模式, 红线, and 防止合理化; "Linter ≠ 编译器" appears twice (常见失败模式 table and 防止合理化 table); and 红线 largely restates 防止合理化. This is deliberate emphasis, but from a token-budget view the red-lines and anti-rationalization sections could be merged, fitting the "could be tightened" anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is maximally concrete: a 5-step gated procedure (确定 → 运行 → 阅读 → 验证 → 结论) with explicit success criteria (0 failures, exit 0, 红-绿 cycle), a claim→required-evidence mapping table, and ✅/❌ example patterns. Every instruction is directly followable, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 门控函数 gives a clearly sequenced 5-step process with an explicit decision branch and feedback loop (如果输出不支持结论 → 用证据说明实际状态), and validation checkpoints are the core of the skill rather than an afterthought, matching the anchor-5 pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed for a behavioral rule. The single SKILL.md is well organized with clear section headers, one-level-flat content, no buried or nested references, and each section (gate function, failure modes, patterns, scope) appropriately placed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |