CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

launch

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'launch checklist,' 'GTM plan,' or 'we're about to ship.' Use this whenever someone is preparing to release something publicly. For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas.

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured strategy skill with genuinely actionable phased guidance, a clear launch sequence with per-phase validation goals, and usable checklists. Its main weaknesses are motivational padding in the philosophy sections, a handful of soft directives lacking operational detail, and a monolithic single-file layout where detailed material (case studies, checklists, Product Hunt playbook) should be split into reference files.

Suggestions

Trim the 'Core Philosophy' section to 2-3 lines or fold it into the intro, and cut rhetorical one-liners that restate section headers (e.g. 'Rented channels give speed, not stability') to tighten the body.

Split the Product Hunt strategy (with case studies) and the full launch checklists into references/ files, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.

Replace soft directives like 'Build relationships with influential supporters' and 'Study successful launches to identify what worked' with concrete tactics or example steps so every instruction is operationally executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and instructional, but contains a dedicated motivational "Core Philosophy" section ("Making a splash at every stage"), rhetorical one-liners that restate section headers ("Rented channels give speed, not stability", "Open the floodgates"), and case studies that run longer than needed to convey their pattern. It's tighter than anchor 2's padded verbosity, but more than "minor instances" of over-explanation, so it doesn't reach anchor 4.

3 / 5

Actionability

The guidance is largely concrete and executable: per-phase action lists ("Create landing page with early access signup form"), a numbered Product Hunt before/launch-day/after playbook, a defined major/medium/minor prioritization matrix, and full pre/launch-day/post checklists. It falls short of anchor 5 because several directives remain high-level without operational detail, e.g. "Build relationships with influential supporters" and "Study successful launches to identify what worked" give no how.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The five-phase approach (Internal → Alpha → Beta → Early Access → Full) is a clearly sequenced process where each phase ends with an explicit validation-oriented goal ("Validate core functionality with friendly users", "Validate at scale and prepare for full launch"), plus checklists at each stage. Missing are explicit go/no-go criteria between phases and failure-handling (what to do if validation fails), which keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned with clear headers, but the bundle contains no reference files at all: everything is inlined in one ~350-line SKILL.md. Content that clearly belongs in separate files — the Product Hunt strategy with two case studies, the three full checklists, and post-launch/ongoing marketing — is inline rather than split into one-level-deep references, matching anchor 3.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it clearly and explicitly states what the skill does and when to use it, with an unusually thorough and natural trigger list, and a boundary clause that separates it from the adjacent marketing-ideas skill. The only weakness is that the what-clause leans on a single planning verb, keeping explicit capability coverage just short of comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The what-clause "plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy" names the domain and several concrete deliverables, and the boundary clause explicitly delegates post-launch work. It falls short of anchor 5 because it lists essentially one planning verb rather than multiple distinct concrete actions, and execution details (PH playbook, checklists) are only implied via trigger terms.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ("plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy") and when ("When the user wants to..." plus "Also use when the user mentions" with concrete trigger phrases). This mirrors the anchor-5 example structure, and adds a boundary pointer to marketing-ideas.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list is comprehensive and natural: 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'go-to-market,' 'GTM plan,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'how do I launch this,' 'we're about to ship.' It includes synonyms (go-to-market/GTM) and phrases users would actually say, matching the anchor-5 standard.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (product launch planning) is distinct with specialized triggers like 'Product Hunt,' 'beta launch,' and 'launch checklist.' The explicit boundary ("For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas") defuses the main overlap risk with the closest adjacent skill.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

joshmanders/dotfiles

Path

claude/skills/launch/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.