Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured methodology skill: concise body, concrete actionable guidance, a clearly sequenced workflow with a built-in check, and clean progressive disclosure via real, well-organized reference files. No dimension shows meaningful weakness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — terse bullets, a compact axis table, and on-demand "Load references/X.md" pointers — and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; it does not fall to level 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only methodology skill the guidance is concrete and specific: per-type principle bullets, a 5-step "How To Apply" process, the two-question compass, a worked example, and a Common Mistakes table with fixes — actionable rather than merely descriptive. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How To Apply" section gives a clear 1–5 sequence with an explicit check ("Check for type mixing") followed by a corrective step ("Separate mixed content"), and the Common Mistakes table acts as a review checklist; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the absence of a hard retry loop does not cap it at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview pointing to one-level-deep reference files, all 12 referenced paths (tutorials.md, how-to-guides.md, compass.md, etc.) exist in ./references/, and the closing "Deep Dives" table provides clear navigation — matching the anchor for a clear overview with well-signaled single-level references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |