Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sequenced advisor workflow with strong validation checkpoints and clean single-level progressive disclosure. It earns high marks across conciseness, workflow clarity, and structure; actionability is strong but procedural rather than copy-paste.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout, assumes Claude's competence, never explains basic concepts; every line carries load (recon checklist, vetting mandate, effort table, handoff contract). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill — specific recon items, subagent prompt contents, finding-table columns, and what to feed writing-plans; held at 4 because guidance is procedural rather than copy-paste-ready code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced phases with explicit validation ("Vet before presenting", confirm cited code yourself, disclose what was not audited), enumerated failure classes, and dependency-ordering plus STOP-condition references. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-signaled one-level reference to the real references/audit-playbook.md ("read it now"); all overview content stays in SKILL.md and navigation is unambiguous. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |