commit

Guided git commit with atomic commit analysis and conventional commit format

Quality

43%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/git-workflow/skills/commit/SKILL.md

commit

Category: Development

Usage

commit [--all | --staged | --interactive]

Arguments

--all: Analyze all uncommitted changes (staged + unstaged)
--staged: Only analyze currently staged changes (default)
--interactive: Guide through staging changes atomically before committing

Execution Method

This command delegates to the commit-expert agent (Haiku model) for fast, cost-effective execution.

Delegation: Use the Task tool with:

subagent_type: "git-workflow:commit-expert"
prompt: Include the mode (--staged, --all, or --interactive) and current working directory

Example:

Task(subagent_type="git-workflow:commit-expert", prompt="Run commit in --staged mode in /path/to/repo")

Execution Instructions for Claude Code

When this command is run, Claude Code should:

Analyze Changes
- Run git status to understand current state
- Run git diff --staged for staged changes (or git diff for all)
- Identify the files and types of changes
Check for Atomic Commit Violations
- Flag if changes span multiple unrelated concerns
- Warn if mixing features, fixes, refactoring, and style changes
- Suggest splitting if commit is too large (>300 lines)
Generate Commit Message
- Determine appropriate type (feat, fix, docs, etc.)
- Identify scope from file paths
- Write clear, imperative description
- Add body if changes are complex
Present for Approval
- Show the proposed commit message
- Allow editing before committing
- Execute the commit

Interactive Flow

Step 1: Analyze Changes

🔍 Analyzing your changes...

Staged changes:
  M  src/auth/login.py (+45, -12)
  M  src/auth/tokens.py (+23, -5)
  A  tests/test_login.py (+89)

Unstaged changes:
  M  src/styles/button.css (+15, -3)
  M  README.md (+20)

Step 2: Atomic Commit Check

✅ Good: Changes appear to be a single logical unit
   All changes relate to authentication/login functionality

   OR

⚠️  Warning: Changes may not be atomic

   These appear to be separate concerns:
   1. Authentication changes (src/auth/*)
   2. Style changes (src/styles/button.css)
   3. Documentation (README.md)

   Recommendations:
   - Commit auth changes first: feat(auth): ...
   - Commit style changes: fix(ui): ...
   - Commit docs separately: docs: ...

   Would you like to:
   1. Proceed with current staging (not recommended)
   2. Unstage some files and commit in parts
   3. Show me how to split this commit

Step 3: Generate Commit Message

📝 Proposed commit message:

   feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation

   Implement automatic token refresh to improve session security.
   Tokens now rotate on each refresh, with old tokens invalidated
   after a 5-minute grace period.

   - Add refresh token rotation logic
   - Update token validation to check rotation status
   - Add tests for token refresh flow

Does this look correct?
   1. Yes, commit with this message
   2. Edit the message
   3. Change the commit type
   4. Cancel

Step 4: Commit Type Selection (if editing)

Select commit type:

   1. feat     - New feature
   2. fix      - Bug fix
   3. docs     - Documentation only
   4. style    - Code style (formatting, no logic change)
   5. refactor - Code restructuring (no feature/fix)
   6. perf     - Performance improvement
   7. test     - Adding/fixing tests
   8. build    - Build system or dependencies
   9. ci       - CI/CD configuration
   10. chore   - Maintenance tasks

Current selection: feat

Enter number or type:

Step 5: Scope Selection

Suggested scopes based on changed files:
   1. auth (src/auth/*)
   2. api (src/api/*)
   3. No scope

Enter scope or select number: auth

Step 6: Description

Write a short description (max 50 chars, imperative mood):

Examples:
   ✅ "add password reset flow"
   ✅ "fix token expiration bug"
   ❌ "added password reset" (past tense)
   ❌ "fixes the token bug" (not imperative)

Description: add JWT refresh token rotation

Step 7: Body (Optional)

Add a commit body? (Explain what and why)

   1. Yes, add details
   2. No, subject line is sufficient

[If yes]
Enter commit body (empty line to finish):
> Implement automatic token refresh to improve session security.
> Tokens now rotate on each refresh, with old tokens invalidated
> after a 5-minute grace period.
>

Step 8: Execute Commit

📋 Final commit message:

feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation

Implement automatic token refresh to improve session security.
Tokens now rotate on each refresh, with old tokens invalidated
after a 5-minute grace period.

Confirm commit? (yes/no/edit): yes

✅ Committed: abc1234
   feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation

   3 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Interactive Staging Mode (--interactive)

When using --interactive, guide users through staging atomic commits:

🎯 Interactive Atomic Commit Mode

Analyzing all changes to help you create atomic commits...

Found 5 modified files with different concerns:

Group 1: Authentication (recommended first commit)
   M  src/auth/login.py
   M  src/auth/tokens.py
   A  tests/test_login.py

Group 2: UI Fixes
   M  src/styles/button.css

Group 3: Documentation
   M  README.md

Stage Group 1 for commit? (yes/no/show diff): yes

[Stages files, then proceeds to commit flow]

Validation Rules

The command should enforce:

Message Length
- Subject: Max 72 characters (warn at 50)
- Body lines: Max 72 characters
Format
- Type is valid conventional commit type
- Uses imperative mood
- No period at end of subject
Content Quality
- Reject vague messages: "fix", "update", "changes", "WIP"
- Require specificity: "fix what?", "update what?"
Atomic Check
- Warn if >5 files changed
- Warn if >300 lines changed
- Warn if multiple file types with different purposes
No AI Tool Attribution
- NEVER include "Generated with Claude Code" or similar AI attribution
- NEVER include "Co-Authored-By: Claude" or any AI co-author footer
- NEVER include emojis like 🤖 indicating AI generation
- Commit messages should appear as human-written, professional commits

Error Handling

❌ No changes to commit
   Run `git status` to see the current state.

❌ Commit message too vague
   "fix bug" is not specific enough.
   Please describe what was fixed: "fix(auth): correct token expiration check"

❌ Not in a git repository
   Initialize with `git init` or navigate to a git repository.

⚠️  Unstaged changes will not be included
   Stage with `git add <file>` or use `commit --all`

Quick Commit Shortcuts

For experienced users, support quick patterns:

# Quick feature commit
commit feat auth "add password reset"

# Quick fix commit
commit fix api "handle null response"

# Quick docs commit
commit docs "update API documentation"

Integration with Git Hooks

Suggest installing hooks for enforcement:

💡 Tip: Install git hooks to enforce commit standards automatically.

   Would you like to set up:
   1. commit-msg hook (validate message format)
   2. pre-commit hook (run tests/linting)
   3. Both
   4. Skip for now

Example Outputs

Simple Commit

$ commit

🔍 Analyzing staged changes...

   M  src/utils/helpers.py (+12, -3)

✅ Single file change - good atomic commit

📝 Proposed: fix(utils): handle edge case in date parser

Commit? (yes/edit/cancel): yes

✅ Committed: def4567

Complex Commit Needing Split

$ commit --all

🔍 Analyzing all changes...

⚠️  Multiple concerns detected:

   Authentication:
      M  src/auth/login.py
      M  src/auth/session.py

   Unrelated UI fix:
      M  src/components/Header.vue

   Documentation:
      M  docs/API.md

Recommendation: Split into 3 commits

   1. Stage auth files → feat(auth): ...
   2. Stage Header.vue → fix(ui): ...
   3. Stage API.md → docs(api): ...

Would you like help staging these separately? (yes/no)

Repository: jpoutrin/product-forge
Commit: 0ebe7ae

Last updated: 29 days ago
Created: 29 days ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.