Create a feature-specific PRD (FRD) for individual features
67
55%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/product-design/skills/create-prd-feature/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a specific document type (feature-specific PRD/FRD) but is too brief to be effective for skill selection. It lacks explicit trigger conditions, concrete actions beyond 'create', and natural keyword variations that users might employ when requesting this type of work.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'feature requirements', 'product spec', 'FRD', 'feature documentation', 'requirements document'
List specific concrete actions such as 'define acceptance criteria', 'document user stories', 'outline technical requirements', 'specify feature scope'
Include common keyword variations users might say: 'feature spec', 'product requirements', 'requirements doc', 'feature definition'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (PRD/FRD creation) and specifies it's for 'individual features', but doesn't list concrete actions like 'define requirements', 'outline acceptance criteria', or 'document user stories'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Only answers 'what' (create FRD for features) but completely lacks any 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'PRD' and 'FRD' which are relevant terms, but misses common variations users might say like 'product requirements', 'feature spec', 'requirements document', or 'feature documentation'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The PRD/FRD focus provides some distinction, but could overlap with general documentation skills or broader product management skills without clearer boundaries. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides excellent actionability with concrete prompts, examples, and a clear sequential workflow for creating feature-level PRDs. The main weakness is verbosity - the extensive inline prompts and examples make it longer than necessary, and the content could benefit from better progressive disclosure by moving detailed section prompts to a reference file.
Suggestions
Move the detailed section prompts (sections 1-13) to a separate reference file like `frd-prompts.md` and keep only the high-level flow in SKILL.md
Consolidate redundant guidance - 'Tips for Claude Code' and 'Task Generation Guidelines' overlap with inline instructions in the sections
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is moderately efficient but includes some redundancy. The 13 sections with detailed prompts are comprehensive but could be tightened - some questions are repetitive across sections, and the extensive example formats add bulk that Claude could infer. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete guidance with specific section-by-section prompts, example formats (Given/When/Then, API specs, task breakdown format), and clear execution instructions. The interactive session flow is copy-paste ready for implementation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 13-step sequential workflow with numbered sections, explicit progress indicators ([Section X of 12]), and a final review checkpoint. The flow from context gathering through task breakdown to business deliverables is logical and well-structured. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References an external template file (frd-template.md) appropriately, but the skill itself is a monolithic document. The detailed section prompts could be split into a separate reference file, with SKILL.md providing just the overview and flow structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
0ebe7ae
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.