Decompose PRDs and Tech Specs into parallel-executable tasks with contracts, prompts, and dependency graphs. Use when breaking down a PRD for multi-agent execution.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jpoutrin/product-forge --skill parallel-decompose88
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Decompose a PRD and Tech Spec into parallel-executable tasks with contracts, dependency graphs, and agent prompts.
flowchart TB
Start[("PRD + Tech Spec")]
Dir["1. Determine Output Dir"]
Analyze["2. Analyze Tech Spec"]
Manifest["3. Create manifest.json"]
Context["4. Create context.md"]
Arch["5. Create architecture.md"]
Contracts["6. Create contracts/"]
Tasks["7. Generate task files"]
Graph["8. Create task-graph.md"]
Prompts["9. Generate prompts/"]
Update["10. Update manifest"]
Report["11. Report Results"]
Start --> Dir
Dir --> Analyze
Analyze --> Manifest
Manifest --> Context
Context --> Arch
Arch --> Contracts
Contracts --> Tasks
Tasks --> Graph
Graph --> Prompts
Prompts --> Update
Update --> Report
Report --> Done(["Ready for cpo run"])PARALLEL_DIR="parallel/TS-0042-inventory-system"parallel/{slug}/If a Tech Spec (TS-XXXX) is provided:
Read and validate Tech Spec:
Extract from Tech Spec:
architecture.mdcontracts/types.pycontracts/api-schema.yamlSkip redundant steps:
If no Tech Spec provided: Generate contracts from PRD and display warning:
"Consider creating a Tech Spec first for better contract definitions"
Use the cpo format:
{
"tech_spec_id": "TS-0042",
"name": "inventory-system",
"technology": "python",
"python_version": "3.11",
"waves": [
{
"number": 1,
"tasks": [
{ "id": "task-001", "agent": "python-experts:django-expert" },
{ "id": "task-002", "agent": "python-experts:django-expert" }
],
"validation": "from apps.users.models import User; print('Wave 1 OK')"
}
],
"metadata": {
"tech_spec": "tech-specs/approved/TS-0042-inventory.md",
"generated_at": "2025-01-15T10:00:00Z",
"total_tasks": 3,
"max_parallel": 2,
"critical_path": ["task-001", "task-003"]
}
}Shared project context read once by all agents (token-efficient):
Create architecture.md with Mermaid component diagram:
graph TB
Client["Client/Frontend"]
Gateway["API Gateway"]
subgraph Users["Users Service<br/>(task-001)"]
UserAPI["User API<br/>/api/users/"]
UserDB["User DB"]
end
subgraph Products["Products Service<br/>(task-002)"]
ProductAPI["Product API<br/>/api/products/"]
ProductDB["Product DB"]
end
Client --> Gateway
Gateway --> UserAPI
Gateway --> ProductAPI
UserAPI --> UserDB
ProductAPI --> ProductDBConventions:
subgraph to group by service/task-->) for direct dependencies-.->) for weak dependenciesfrom dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Optional
from datetime import datetime
from enum import Enum
class UserRole(str, Enum):
ADMIN = "admin"
USER = "user"
@dataclass
class User:
id: int
email: str
username: str
role: UserRole
created_at: datetime
@dataclass
class UserCreateRequest:
email: str
username: str
password: stropenapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: API
version: 1.0.0
components:
schemas:
User:
type: object
required: [id, email, username]
properties:
id: {type: integer}
email: {type: string, format: email}
username: {type: string}
paths:
/users:
get:
summary: List users
responses:
'200':
description: User listCreate task specs in tasks/ using compact YAML format.
See the parallel-task-format skill for the complete task specification format.
Dependency visualization with Mermaid:
flowchart TB
subgraph W1[Wave 1 - parallel]
t001[task-001-users<br/>django-expert]
t002[task-002-products<br/>django-expert]
end
subgraph W2[Wave 2 - parallel]
t003[task-003-orders<br/>django-expert]
end
t001 --> t003
t002 --> t003Include Gantt chart for timeline:
gantt
title Parallel Task Execution
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Wave 1
task-001-users :t001, 2025-01-01, 4h
task-002-products :t002, 2025-01-01, 4h
section Wave 2
task-003-orders :crit, t003, after t001, 3hUse the parallel-prompt-generator skill to generate agent-ready prompts from the task files.
This creates:
prompts/agent-prompts.md - Wave summary and launch commandsprompts/task-NNN.txt - Individual agent promptsSee the parallel-prompt-generator skill for the complete prompt template and generation workflow.
Key points:
context.md contentUpdate manifest.json with final task counts.
Report summary:
Decomposition Complete
Output: parallel/TS-0042-inventory-system/
Source: docs/prd.md
Tech Spec: TS-0042
Tasks: 6
Waves: 3
Max parallel: 3
Next: Run cpo run parallel/TS-0042-inventory-system/Merge conflicts happen when parallel tasks touch the same lines. Follow these rules:
A file can appear in CREATE for exactly one task across all waves.
# task-001 (Wave 1)
CREATE: rag/core/acl.py # Only task-001 can create this
# task-002 (Wave 1) - WRONG
CREATE: rag/core/acl.py # CONFLICT - already created by task-001Multiple tasks CAN modify the same file in the same wave only if each task owns distinct sections (functions, classes, methods).
Scoped MODIFY syntax:
MODIFY: path/file.py::ClassName # Owns entire class
MODIFY: path/file.py::function_name # Owns entire function
MODIFY: path/file.py::ClassName.method # Owns specific methodParallel MODIFY - ALLOWED (different scopes):
# Wave 2 - OK, different functions
task-003: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py::to_sql_conditions
task-004: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py::to_mongo_conditionsParallel MODIFY - NOT ALLOWED (overlapping scopes):
# Wave 2 - CONFLICT, same scope or unscoped
task-003: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py
task-004: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py
# Wave 2 - CONFLICT, nested scopes
task-003: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py::ACLFilterSpec
task-004: MODIFY: rag/core/acl.py::ACLFilterSpec.validateBuild this matrix before generating tasks:
| File | CREATE | MODIFY (scoped) | Wave |
|---|---|---|---|
rag/core/acl.py | task-001 | - | W1 |
rag/core/acl.py::to_sql_conditions | - | task-003 | W2 |
rag/core/acl.py::to_mongo_conditions | - | task-004 | W2 |
rag/core/interfaces.py | task-003 | - | W2 |
1. COUNT(tasks where file F in CREATE) <= 1
2. For parallel tasks (same wave):
- If MODIFY is unscoped (no ::), only ONE task can touch file F
- If MODIFY is scoped (has ::), scopes must NOT overlap
3. Scopes overlap if:
- Same scope (both ::ClassName)
- One contains other (::ClassName vs ::ClassName.method)Before finalizing:
parallel-task-format skill)Wave 1: shared-models (contracts)
Wave 2: users-service, products-service, orders-service (parallel)
Wave 3: api-gateway
Wave 4: integration-testsWave 1: models-and-migrations
Wave 2: views-and-serializers, api-endpoints (parallel)
Wave 3: comprehensive-testsWave 1: types-and-hooks
Wave 2: form-components, list-components (parallel)
Wave 3: pages (parallel)
Wave 4: routing-and-integrationSplit coupled tasks or create intermediate shared task.
Split by component (models, views, tests) or defer optional features.
Warn user, generate best-effort contracts with TODOs.
Update contracts first, then regenerate prompts.
0ebe7ae
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.