Run bounded automated experiment iterations by recording baselines, applying hypothesis patches, comparing metrics, protecting regression guards, and deciding keep, discard, rollback, or block. Use when automated research is requested or a repo/skill needs evidence-backed research, metric tracking, or safe optimisation loops.
69
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required runtime workflow includes reading and ingesting project files like `README.md`, `program.md`, `prepare.py`, and `train.py` (and potentially `run.log`/`ledger` outputs) as untrusted text into the agent context, which can contain outsider-authored free text (e.g., malicious prompt-injection in repo files) via the “prompt injection in project file” risk path.
4f7075e
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.