CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

code-fixes-triage

Turn Slack #code-fixes, CodeRabbit, Codex Review, CI, and check-status noise into a repo-and-PR action queue. Use when Jamie asks for a daily code-fixes digest, recent review-noise triage, or what needs fixing across active engineering repos.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill: sequenced workflow with explicit checkpoints and failure recovery, a concrete output schema, executable validation, and real one-level-deep references. The main drag is redundancy — duplicated redaction rules and heavily overlapping Gotchas/Anti-Pattern sections — plus an orphaned bundle file the body never points to.

Suggestions

Merge the duplicate redaction guidance: 'Redact secrets, private URLs, credentials, customer data, and sensitive operational details' appears in both Execution Boundaries and Constraints — keep it once.

Collapse the overlapping Gotchas and Anti-Pattern sections into one list; items like 'treating a CodeRabbit summary or Slack message as current PR state' are stated nearly verbatim in both.

Either reference references/task-profile.json from the body (e.g., in Inputs or Validation) so the whole bundle is navigable, or remove it from the bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but there is real duplication that could be tightened: redaction appears twice ('Redact secrets, private URLs, credentials, customer data' in Execution Boundaries and 'Redact secrets, tokens, API keys, credentials, PII' in Constraints), and Gotchas and Anti-Pattern overlap heavily ('Treating every bot message as actionable without stale-thread or latest-head checks' vs 'Treating a CodeRabbit summary, Slack message, or old CI notification as the current PR state').

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a copy-paste YAML output template with named buckets (fix_now/monitor/informational/blocked) and owner lanes, an executable validation command ('./bin/ask skills audit ... --level strict --json --robot'), and three dialogue Examples. Minor gaps remain in the gathering steps, e.g., 'refresh the live state that matters' leaves the exact tool invocations to judgment rather than naming specific commands.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence with explicit checkpoints ('Refresh live truth before placing any item in fix_now', 'Stop before implementing fixes unless the user asked for follow-through') and a genuine feedback loop in the Failure Mode section: 'If live truth cannot be refreshed, keep the item in blocked... Do not upgrade the item to fix_now from stale notification text.' The skill is read-mostly classification, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references that both exist on disk ('See references/contract.yaml for the compact machine-readable contract and references/evals.yaml for routing checks'). However, the bundle also contains references/task-profile.json, which is never referenced or navigated to from the body, leaving a minor organization gap against the actual bundle structure.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states a concrete transformation, names its signal sources precisely, and gives an explicit 'Use when' clause with three natural trigger phrases. The only weaknesses are the single action verb and a slightly broad final trigger that could brush against general code-fix skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The single action 'Turn Slack #code-fixes, CodeRabbit, Codex Review, CI, and check-status noise into a repo-and-PR action queue' is concrete, and the domain is named comprehensively and precisely. It sits between anchor 3 (1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive) and anchor 4 (several specific actions): the transformation is specific but only one action is listed, while domain coverage is well above anchor 3.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers both questions: the 'what' is 'Turn... noise into a repo-and-PR action queue' and the 'when' is explicit via 'Use when Jamie asks for a daily code-fixes digest, recent review-noise triage, or what needs fixing across active engineering repos' with three concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would say are present: 'daily code-fixes digest', 'recent review-noise triage', 'what needs fixing across active engineering repos', plus concrete tool and channel names (Slack #code-fixes, CodeRabbit, Codex Review, CI). A few natural synonyms are missing (e.g., 'PR review comments', 'CI failures', 'triage PR comments'), keeping it below the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (review/CI signal triage for a specific Slack channel) with distinct triggers like '#code-fixes', 'CodeRabbit', and 'code-fixes digest'. The broader phrase 'what needs fixing across active engineering repos' has minor overlap risk with general code-review or fix skills, so it does not fully reach the minimal-conflict anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

jscraik/Agent-Skills

Path

Skills/agent-ops/code-fixes-triage/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.