Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, actionable skill body with concrete commands, an explicit validation-gated workflow, and clean one-level-deep references. Minor conciseness redundancy and slightly thin inline examples keep it just short of perfect.
Suggestions
Dedupe the supported-event list (Workflow step 5 repeats events already named elsewhere) to tighten conciseness.
Fold the 'Examples' section's repair-loop items into the Workflow/Validation sections where they overlap, reducing restatement.
Inline one complete command-hook script example in the Hook Pack Example block so the core case is fully executable without opening references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse, directive prose that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining hooks/JSON/sandboxing basics, with minor redundancy (event lists repeated in Workflow step 5 and Examples restating Workflow) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (rg/find with -perm -111, 'jq empty <hooks.json>', './bin/ask skills audit', 'plugin-eval analyze') and a real JSON hook example, with minor gaps where fuller examples are deferred to references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step sequenced workflow with explicit validation gates and feedback loops ('fix the first failed gate before continuing', 'stop at first failed gate; do not proceed until it is fixed and rerun') appropriate for a destructive code-execution skill. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview body with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (discovery-interview.md, hook-examples.md, contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json) that are all real files, with detail appropriately split out. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |