Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-sectioned instruction-style skill with an exemplary sequenced workflow, explicit validation gates, and fix-and-rerun feedback loops. It is weakened by verbatim section duplication, guidance that stays too abstract to execute directly, and a Progressive Disclosure section whose reference paths don't match the actual bundle files.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the body: merge the verbatim-duplicate Anti-Patterns section into Avoid, and consolidate the repeated failed-gate language from Constraints, Validation, and Failure Mode into one authoritative statement.
Make guidance executable: specify concrete verification steps (e.g., the actual browser/screenshot command or accessibility checks to run in step 5) instead of "Use browser or screenshot verification" and "Run the smallest repo command that exercises changed behavior".
Fix the Progressive Disclosure references to point at files that actually exist in the bundle (references/contract.yaml, references/evals.yaml, references/task-profile.json) and flatten the "Archived full context" archive pointer, which adds a second level of nesting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The bullet style is mostly efficient and avoids explaining known concepts, but the "Avoid" and "Anti-Patterns" sections repeat the same three bullets verbatim ("Do not own backend-only work", "Do not own token-governance...", "Do not invent audience, task, or tone..."), and failed-gate language recurs nearly verbatim across Constraints, Validation, and Failure Mode — more than the minor trimming of a 4, less severe than the padding of a 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is some concrete guidance — named states ("empty, loading, error, mobile, or keyboard states"), concrete user-request examples, and specific failure-handling rules — but no executable commands or concrete verification methods, and steps like "Implement or hand off using repo-native patterns" and "Run the smallest repo command that exercises changed behavior" stay high-level, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation step ("Verify accessibility, mobile/desktop fit, and no overlapping text"), a dedicated Validation section, and explicit fix-and-rerun feedback loops ("fix the smallest layout, state, or accessibility issue within implementation scope and rerun the same check"; "Rerun the affected check after a repair"), plus gate-stopping ("Stop dependent actions and claims at a failed gate") — matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well-sectioned, but scored against the actual bundle: the "Progressive Disclosure" section points to paths like "Infrastructure/references/openai-cookbook-expert-lens-pack.md" that do not exist in this bundle's references/ directory, while the real bundle files (references/contract.yaml, references/evals.yaml, references/task-profile.json) are never referenced, and the "Archived full context" pointer adds a second nesting level — references are present but do not resolve, fitting the some-structure anchor rather than the well-signaled 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |