Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concise, and assumption-respecting, with an executable example and validation checkpoints that give a coherent workflow. Main gaps are the slightly abstract Procedure steps and an inaccurate reference path that weakens navigation.
Suggestions
Replace the generic Procedure steps with concrete, runnable commands (e.g., the specific validation commands to re-run) to lift actionability.
Fix the broken reference path from `Infrastructure/references/deep-guidance.md` to the actual `references/deep-guidance.md` so navigation resolves.
Tighten the Philosophy section or fold its principles into the existing Style/Constraints bullets to remove the last traces of padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, bullet-style guidance that assumes Go competence and avoids explaining basics, with only minor generic padding in the Philosophy section that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides one executable Go example (ParsePort with `%w` error wrapping) and concrete directives like "Return wrapped errors with `%w`", but the Procedure steps remain high-level ("Apply focused changes", "Re-run highest-signal validations") without specific commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step Procedure is paired with a Validation section containing fail-fast and re-run-after-fix checkpoints, leaving only minor gaps in explicit feedback-loop detail. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with a Table of Contents and a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (deep-guidance.md), but the body cites the path as `Infrastructure/references/deep-guidance.md`, which does not match the actual bundle location `references/deep-guidance.md`. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |