Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints. It loses points on actionability (no executable commands) and progressive disclosure (the referenced bundle files do not exist in the skill directory).
Suggestions
Provide at least one concrete executable command or invocation example in the Procedure (e.g., the exact session-collector command or a validation command) to lift actionability toward 4-5.
Either create the referenced references/session-evidence-contract.md and assets/icon-small.png / icon-large.png bundle files, or remove the broken links so navigation targets are real.
Inline the one or two most-used validation/inspection commands rather than only describing them as 'smallest safe live-state checks', so the workflow's checkpoints become runnable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-driven body with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Philosophy, Failure Modes, Procedure, Validation) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete enumeration of targets, outcomes, and mode normalization is actionable, but the procedure is instruction-level with no executable commands, code, or exact validation invocations beyond the one session-collector reference. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step sequenced procedure with a dedicated Validation section and an explicit 'Fail fast: stop at first failed gate' checkpoint, though validation steps are described rather than given as runnable commands. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references a session-evidence-contract.md at ../../../references/ and two asset icons, but no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle directories exist, so the referenced one-level-deep files are broken/missing. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |