Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable instruction skill with a clearly sequenced procedure, explicit validation/fail-fast feedback loops, and well-organized conditional references. Minor conciseness and external-reference-verification gaps keep it just short of perfect.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~210-line body is dense and domain-specific with no basic-concept padding ('BLUF', 'gate matrices' used without explanation), but a few closure-recommendation enumerations repeat across sections and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands ('python3 Plugins/.../validate_eval_report.py'), exact output paths, explicit frontmatter field lists, and pass|fail|blocked outcomes give fully executable guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 11-step Procedure with explicit validation checkpoints ('Run or explicitly block relevant validation gates; never invent passing results', 'Fail fast: stop at the first failed gate...rerun') provides clear sequencing and feedback loops for the destructive/batch closure context. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep References section; local bundle refs (references/contract.yaml, references/evals.yaml, references/source-prompt-preservation.md) are present, though many ../../ and Plugins/ reference paths point outside the bundle and could not be verified. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |