Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an actionable, well-sequenced instruction skill with strong workflow gates, but it loses points on token efficiency and progressive disclosure due to redundant philosophy prose and a disorganized Full Context section that references files absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Remove the Philosophy section or fold its one-line principles into the Procedure to eliminate repetition with steps 5-9.
Audit the Full Context links against the actual bundle and delete or repair references to non-existent files (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json, domain-model-routing.md, qa-intake-routing.md, runtime-evidence-intake.md, subagent-routing.md, routing-map.json).
Reattach each orphaned "Read when:" line to its referenced file so navigation signals are unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient policy prose, but the Philosophy section restates Procedure steps and the Full Context section is padded with orphaned "Read when:" lines, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — bounded question counts ("at most 2-3"), targeted log reads, explicit schema_version and gate conditions — with no vague abstraction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 9-step Procedure paired with an explicit Validation section and a "Fail fast: stop at first failed gate" checkpoint provides strong feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one-level-deep but poorly signaled: many cited paths (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, domain-model-routing.md) do not exist in the bundle, and several "Read when:" lines are detached from their references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |