Content
45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized instruction-only body with a genuine validation culture (fail-fast gates, verified durable writes), but it operates at framework altitude: nearly every step depends on artifacts (optimization spec, measurement harness, session-evidence contract) that are never concretized, and every referenced bundle file is missing. Adding a minimal spec/gate example and fixing the reference paths would lift the two weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Show a minimal concrete example of the optimization spec and a measurement gate (e.g., a short YAML snippet with metric type, target, gate, and stopping limit) so procedure step 1 is executable rather than aspirational.
Fix progressive disclosure: bundle 'session-evidence-contract.md' under a real references/ path with a one-level-deep relative link, and either include or remove the ./assets/icon-*.png links that currently point to nonexistent files.
Name the measurement harness and where experiment state is written (file paths) so 'run bounded iterations with isolated experiment state' has an operational answer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient imperative bullets that assume Claude's competence, but the meta 'Progressive Disclosure Entry' section and durability/validation points repeated across Philosophy, Procedure, Validation, and Constraints could be tightened. More than the minor over-explanation of anchor 4, short of the padding of anchor 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | High-level hints with occasional specifics ('schema_version: 1', 'fresh versus resume state', '~/.agents/session-collector') but no executable specifics: the optimization spec has no format or location, the 'measurement harness' is never identified, and no example of a gate, spec, or experiment state file is given. This matches anchor 2 — missing the specific steps to execute — rather than anchor 3's 'concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (validate the spec before experimentation, verify disk writes before reporting, 'Fail fast: stop at first failed gate') and a keep/revise/discard feedback loop. Falls short of anchor 5 because error recovery beyond 'stop' is thin and steps like 'classify recurring signals' and 'route proven results' lack operational detail. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body's core claim — 'keeps full operational context in archived references' — rests on links to files that do not exist in the bundle: '../../../../../../references/session-evidence-contract.md' (a buried six-levels-up path) and './assets/icon-small.png' / 'icon-large.png'. The body itself is well-sectioned, but the references are broken and buried, matching anchor 2 rather than anchor 3's merely 'not clearly signaled' references. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |