Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized with strong progressive-disclosure signaling and a clear procedure, but it leans on external preserved files for real executable detail and has some restatement across overlapping sections. Verification of the actual RED/GREEN behavior is described rather than checkpointed with a test command.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate-test -> fix -> re-run feedback loop with the repository test command so RED/GREEN verification is a checkpoint, not just described.
Merge or cut the overlapping "Use" / "When to use" / "Progressive Disclosure Entry" framing to remove restatement.
Inline at least one minimal RED/GREEN test example or the test command so the skill is actionable without loading external repo files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are mostly lean lists, but "When to use" restates the description and overlaps with "Use", and the "Progressive Disclosure Entry"/"Full Context" framing adds restatement that could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | A concrete audit command and concrete RED/GREEN procedural steps exist, but core instruction (test commands, interface selection) is abstract and externalized to preserved repo files that are not loadable here. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Procedure is clearly sequenced with a fail-fast gate, but the in-file validation command audits the skill rather than the RED/GREEN behavior, leaving the validate-test->fix->retry feedback loop implicit and without a test command. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The entry is a concise overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep "Full Context" section where each reference carries a "Read when:" trigger, matching the clear-overview-with-navigation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |